| Brown backs down, Turner pension recommendations... [message #377785] |
Mi, 05 April 2006 17:15 |
|
....retiring age to go up with targets for new laws to be in place by...
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=1&subID=3 96
|
|
|
| Re: Brown backs down, Turner pension recommendations... [message #377791 ] |
Mi, 05 April 2006 18:30 |
|
"Old Boy" <mazoldboy [at] googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1144250130.947782.183500 [at] i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> ...retiring age to go up with targets for new laws to be in place by...
Hrm, work until you're 95 and we'll give you a free lolly-pop, gotta
grinding on, if only to pay for those unfunded pensions for all those
'decrepit' 55 year olds that *need* to retire.
|
|
|
| Re: Brown backs down, Turner pension recommendations... [message #377808 ] |
Do, 06 April 2006 00:46 |
|
The difficulty with all of this is that Government or rather the Civil
Service is a major culprit when it comes to age discrimination. At 59
I am skilled enought to carry out contract work for the DCSA but
apparently not to be given a permanent job - except at a very low paid
D grade.
This is rife throughout industry and whilst laws are to be in place in
October to outlaw age discrimination it will take a major culture shift
for employers to start taking on the over 60s.
|
|
|
| Re: Brown backs down, Turner pension recommendations... [message #377812 ] |
Do, 06 April 2006 08:21 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Brown backs down, Turner pension recommendations... [message #377854 ] |
Do, 06 April 2006 21:55 |
|
"nagsman" <pat.bryant [at] ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1144277192.448597.28860 [at] g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> The difficulty with all of this is that Government or rather the Civil
> Service is a major culprit when it comes to age discrimination.
Oh well, they'll just have to go home and make do with their superannuated
gold plated final salary scheme, such is the sacrifice :)
|
|
|