| tax credits - IR want money returned [message #390302] |
So, 21 Mai 2006 22:27 |
|
Does anyone know under what circumstances the tax credit people will be
lenient on getting over-payments back from punters?
matt
|
|
|
| Re: tax credits - IR want money returned [message #390304 ] |
So, 21 Mai 2006 22:57 |
|
matt wrote:
> Does anyone know under what circumstances the tax credit people will be
> lenient on getting over-payments back from punters?
>
> matt
Cases where you can show the "mistake" is down to them, or if it causes
"significant hardship" (though this only defers repayment, and
definition of "significant hardship" is undefined)
|
|
|
| Re: tax credits - IR want money returned [message #390346 ] |
Mo, 22 Mai 2006 17:11 |
|
On Sun, 21 May 2006 21:57:54 +0100, Ian Cornish <icornish [at] talk21.com>
wrote:
>matt wrote:
>> Does anyone know under what circumstances the tax credit people will be
>> lenient on getting over-payments back from punters?
>>
>> matt
>Cases where you can show the "mistake" is down to them, or if it causes
>"significant hardship" (though this only defers repayment, and
>definition of "significant hardship" is undefined)
But how do you prove they mistake is down to them?
--
Get money off vouchers for everything
http://www.moneyoffvouchers.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: tax credits - IR want money returned [message #390355 ] |
Mo, 22 Mai 2006 20:10 |
|
mogga wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2006 21:57:54 +0100, Ian Cornish <icornish [at] talk21.com>
> wrote:
>
>> matt wrote:
>>> Does anyone know under what circumstances the tax credit people will be
>>> lenient on getting over-payments back from punters?
>>>
>>> matt
>> Cases where you can show the "mistake" is down to them, or if it causes
>> "significant hardship" (though this only defers repayment, and
>> definition of "significant hardship" is undefined)
>
> But how do you prove they mistake is down to them?
That is also very difficult, and it is down to keeping good records, and
reading through the (tons of) details of the regulations. It does take a
lot of effort.
|
|
|
| Re: tax credits - IR want money returned [message #390402 ] |
Di, 23 Mai 2006 21:18 |
|
On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:10:02 +0100, Ian Cornish <icornish [at] talk21.com>
wrote:
>mogga wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 May 2006 21:57:54 +0100, Ian Cornish <icornish [at] talk21.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> matt wrote:
>>>> Does anyone know under what circumstances the tax credit people will be
>>>> lenient on getting over-payments back from punters?
>>>>
>>>> matt
>>> Cases where you can show the "mistake" is down to them, or if it causes
>>> "significant hardship" (though this only defers repayment, and
>>> definition of "significant hardship" is undefined)
>>
>> But how do you prove they mistake is down to them?
>
>That is also very difficult, and it is down to keeping good records, and
>reading through the (tons of) details of the regulations. It does take a
>lot of effort.
Can you request they send you what info they've been told by yourself
if you've not kept adequate records?
--
Get money off vouchers for everything
http://www.moneyoffvouchers.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: tax credits - IR want money returned [message #390405 ] |
Di, 23 Mai 2006 21:45 |
|
mogga wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:10:02 +0100, Ian Cornish <icornish [at] talk21.com>
> wrote:
>
>> mogga wrote:
>>> On Sun, 21 May 2006 21:57:54 +0100, Ian Cornish <icornish [at] talk21.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> matt wrote:
>>>>> Does anyone know under what circumstances the tax credit people will be
>>>>> lenient on getting over-payments back from punters?
>>>>>
>>>>> matt
>>>> Cases where you can show the "mistake" is down to them, or if it causes
>>>> "significant hardship" (though this only defers repayment, and
>>>> definition of "significant hardship" is undefined)
>>> But how do you prove they mistake is down to them?
>> That is also very difficult, and it is down to keeping good records, and
>> reading through the (tons of) details of the regulations. It does take a
>> lot of effort.
>
> Can you request they send you what info they've been told by yourself
> if you've not kept adequate records?
Possibly, under the Freedom of Information Act. But the burden of proof
is on you to prove the information is correct (it is the tax man, after all)
|
|
|
