| Re: Winning Trader's software collection! [message #382903] |
Fr, 21 April 2006 07:02 |
|
"leggett" <leggett [at] winning.com> wrote in message
news:1145578329.642913.92300 [at] e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com
> for sale:
Yes, you need to sell them because they don't work to make money for you.
|
|
|
| Re: Winning Trader's software collection! [message #382908 ] |
Fr, 21 April 2006 09:27 |
|
"sara lautman" <slautman [at] jn631c.inv> wrote in message
news:4ar7biFuakhdU1 [at] individual.net...
> "leggett" <leggett [at] winning.com> wrote in message
> news:1145578329.642913.92300 [at] e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com
>
>> for sale:
>
> Yes, you need to sell them because they don't work to make money for you.
errrr no, its because its pirated software this spam comes up about once a
week!
--
Tumbleweed
email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com
|
|
|
| Re: Winning Trader's software collection! [message #383285 ] |
Di, 25 April 2006 14:55 |
|
Hey sara, do you remember, saying 'life is too short for buggy
software?'
You said this w/o much justification as I recall....
what is your ***actual*** view on various neural network software.
I do know a lot of software out there cannot work. For example which is
based on Fibonacci
ideas. The idea behind that is just wrong.
Also, the idea that a sort of guru program will come up with a
prediction automatically, that is wrong.
But, if a person admits that what he is providing is an actual,
well-defined mathematical
calculation, it should be OK. For instance, if a person gives a
calculator to an architect,
saying 'This is easier than doing multiplication by hand,' that is
valid. It is not valid to say,
'This device will tell you the best height and position to put a
building. Do you understand
the distinction I am making here?
You know I'm involved with one particular product, which I've mentioned
and I will not mention it again because the purpose of this email is
not to market it further, but I really would value getting an honest
discussion.
I am writing to you because you actually said something, that life is
too short to deal with buggy software. Good, that's a start. Now, do
you have any experience with neural software, do you want to venture an
opinion. I'm not trying to sell somthing here, and will v happily send
you the reg key, that is not what it is about. Rather, I'm looking for
critical feedback maybe a little more thoughtful than
previously........and not just the opinions of friends or colleagues,
but I want the nasty stuff, eg it doesn't work, I didn't undersatnd it,
it is misleading, not worth it, or whatever.
I hope you see that this post is a little different than the spam
above, which someone cut and pasted in. I am, here, a real person, and
trying to provide a service that the majority of people know little
about, but some do.
|
|
|
| Re: Winning Trader's software collection! [message #383377 ] |
Di, 25 April 2006 22:27 |
|
"mctaggart" <john.atwell.moody [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145969748.603841.61360 [at] t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
> Hey sara, do you remember, saying 'life is too short for buggy
> software?'
> You said this w/o much justification as I recall....
> what is your ***actual*** view on various neural network software.
"Neural network" is just a cutesy buzz{word|phrase} to entice people toward
standalone crap software that has absolutley nothing to do with the concepts
involved.
It's like the fellow at the restaurant who ordered the "fresh fruit salad"
from the menu, and complained to the waitperson when it was served that the
anemic-looking canned fruit cocktail was anything *but* a "fresh fruit
salad."
"Oh," said the waitperson, "that's just what they _call_ it!"
|
|
|
