| Double your money [message #397550] |
Mi, 12 Juli 2006 18:30 |
|
|
http://www.minesite.com/Downloads/brokersResearchNotes/CENTC HINAGLDF_Special_UpdateJuly06.pdf
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397551 ] |
Mi, 12 Juli 2006 18:32 |
|
SPAM...
Anyone got a tin of SPAM?!
abuse report sent to abuse [at] demon.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397564 ] |
Mi, 12 Juli 2006 21:43 |
|
Who made you usenet police?
I posted a link to an article on a leading mining news and analysis
website.
How could this possibly be spam?
Just trying to spread a little happiness, unlike yourself.
H..
Who me? wrote:
> SPAM...
>
> Anyone got a tin of SPAM?!
>
> abuse report sent to abuse [at] demon.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397568 ] |
Mi, 12 Juli 2006 22:39 |
|
Nope, it was spam. Therefore you get reported to your web hosting
company.
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397570 ] |
Mi, 12 Juli 2006 22:55 |
|
Define spam.
jameshamilton777 [at] hotmail.com wrote:
> Nope, it was spam. Therefore you get reported to your web hosting
> company.
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397581 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 08:32 |
|
On 12 Jul 2006 13:55:09 -0700, "H" <henrymcivor [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>Define spam.
>
>
>
>
>
>jameshamilton777 [at] hotmail.com wrote:
>> Nope, it was spam. Therefore you get reported to your web hosting
>> company.
Anything with a subject line like yours must be regarded as spam
unless proven otherwise.
Tiddy Ogg.
http://www.tiddyogg.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397583 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 10:51 |
|
"H" <henrymcivor [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1152737709.887442.289350 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Define spam.
You asked for it...
*http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/s/spam.html*
Electronic junk mail or junk newsgroup postings. Some people define spam
even more generally as any unsolicited e-mail. However, if a long-lost
brother finds your e-mail address and sends you a message, this could hardly
be called spam, even though it's unsolicited. Real spam is generally e-mail
advertising for some product sent to a mailing list or newsgroup.
In addition to wasting people's time with unwanted e-mail, spam also eats up
a lot of network bandwidth. Consequently, there are many organizations, as
well as individuals, who have taken it upon themselves to fight spam with a
variety of techniques. But because the Internet is public, there is really
little that can be done to prevent spam, just as it is impossible to prevent
junk mail. However, some online services have instituted policies to prevent
spammers from spamming their subscribers.
There is some debate about the source of the term, but the generally
accepted version is that it comes from the Monty Python song, "Spam spam
spam spam, spam spam spam spam, lovely spam, wonderful spam." Like the song,
spam is an endless repetition of worthless text. Another school of thought
maintains that it comes from the computer group lab at the University of
Southern California who gave it the name because it has many of the same
characteristics as the lunchmeat Spam:
Nobody wants it or ever asks for it.
No one ever eats it; it is the first item to be pushed to the side when
eating the entree.
Sometimes it is actually tasty, like 1% of junk mail that is really useful
to some people.
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397598 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 18:13 |
|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:51:42 +0100, "Who me?"
<usenet.user [at] dsl.spammepipex.com> wrote:
>"H" <henrymcivor [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1152737709.887442.289350 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> Define spam.
>
>You asked for it...
>
>*http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/s/spam.html*
I noticed someone (the spammer no doubt) had rated your posts as poor
on Google Groups -
< URL:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.finance/browse_frm/t hread/c294acd99d3b71f4/1a4b4f700a4d5df1?hl=en#1a4b4f700a4d5d f1>
I've noticed spammers doing the same on other occasions which will
screw things up if Google ever decide to make use of these ratings.
I've tried to redress the balance a little :-)
Daytona
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397603 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 18:56 |
|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:13:43 +0100, Daytona <me [at] privacy.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:51:42 +0100, "Who me?"
><usenet.user [at] dsl.spammepipex.com> wrote:
>
>I noticed someone (the spammer no doubt) had rated your posts as poor
>on Google Groups -
>
>I've noticed spammers doing the same on other occasions which will
>screw things up if Google ever decide to make use of these ratings.
But what on earth does that matter?
Who will see it except other losers using google groups?
Tiddy Ogg.
http://www.tiddyogg.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397610 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 20:18 |
|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:56:06 +0100, Tiddy Ogg
<tiddyogg [at] madasasheep.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:13:43 +0100, Daytona <me [at] privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:51:42 +0100, "Who me?"
>><usenet.user [at] dsl.spammepipex.com> wrote:
>>
>>I noticed someone (the spammer no doubt) had rated your posts as poor
>>on Google Groups -
>>
>>I've noticed spammers doing the same on other occasions which will
>>screw things up if Google ever decide to make use of these ratings.
>But what on earth does that matter?
>Who will see it except other losers using google groups?
Lots of people use Google Groups including me.
Care to explain how that makes me a loser ?
Daytona
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397616 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 21:43 |
|
Bitstring <sf3db29h0em6n03gtdnmgkvag6v4gr2u3m [at] 4ax.com>, from the
wonderful person Daytona <me [at] privacy.net> said
>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:56:06 +0100, Tiddy Ogg
><tiddyogg [at] madasasheep.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:13:43 +0100, Daytona <me [at] privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:51:42 +0100, "Who me?"
>>><usenet.user [at] dsl.spammepipex.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I noticed someone (the spammer no doubt) had rated your posts as poor
>>>on Google Groups -
>>>
>>>I've noticed spammers doing the same on other occasions which will
>>>screw things up if Google ever decide to make use of these ratings.
>>But what on earth does that matter?
>>Who will see it except other losers using google groups?
>
>Lots of people use Google Groups including me.
>
>Care to explain how that makes me a loser ?
You've lost out on the facilities offered by a decent newsreader, and
you are supporting a service which resolutely refuses to do anything
about the amount of spam being spewed into usenet via its system. As a
result many people (me included) now just killfile anything originating
from googlegroups.
Since I saw the post above I deduce it =wasn't= posted via googlegroups,
so presumably you are only a part-time loser ..
--
GSV Three Minds in a Can
Google may be your friend, but groups.google.com posters definitely aren't.
|
|
|
| Re: Double your money [message #397618 ] |
Do, 13 Juli 2006 22:29 |
|
Anyway!
If anyone acted on my so called spam, well done! You have made 7.23%
today.
More than you'll make in a year in your bank account or building
society.
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GGG.L
I still don't think a link to a legitimate website is spam.
H..
GSV Three Minds in a Can wrote:
> Bitstring <sf3db29h0em6n03gtdnmgkvag6v4gr2u3m [at] 4ax.com>, from the
> wonderful person Daytona <me [at] privacy.net> said
> >On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:56:06 +0100, Tiddy Ogg
> ><tiddyogg [at] madasasheep.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:13:43 +0100, Daytona <me [at] privacy.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:51:42 +0100, "Who me?"
> >>><usenet.user [at] dsl.spammepipex.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I noticed someone (the spammer no doubt) had rated your posts as poor
> >>>on Google Groups -
> >>>
> >>>I've noticed spammers doing the same on other occasions which will
> >>>screw things up if Google ever decide to make use of these ratings.
> >>But what on earth does that matter?
> >>Who will see it except other losers using google groups?
> >
> >Lots of people use Google Groups including me.
> >
> >Care to explain how that makes me a loser ?
>
> You've lost out on the facilities offered by a decent newsreader, and
> you are supporting a service which resolutely refuses to do anything
> about the amount of spam being spewed into usenet via its system. As a
> result many people (me included) now just killfile anything originating
> from googlegroups.
>
> Since I saw the post above I deduce it =wasn't= posted via googlegroups,
> so presumably you are only a part-time loser ..
>
> --
> GSV Three Minds in a Can
> Google may be your friend, but groups.google.com posters definitely aren't.
|
|
|
