In article <>,
carole <> wrote:
> I just don't understand this thing that Perth will die.
> If you look at this scientific website at
Carole!! He's a loonie. Whatever he may or may not have been once, the
guy has totally lost it. What's more he never responds to replies.
Just ignore him, kill filter or whatever. Logic or reason are not
required.
The way I see it our current systems - medicine, politics, economy,
government, law, education, science etc. are all based on frauds. I'd
be hiding my head in the sand if I ignored JP or anybody who claims to
have a solution just because it doesn't fit in with current orthodoxy.
Logic and reason come into everything.
Answers to all problems exist. Some people have the answers and JP may
be one of those people.
Carole
The way I see it our current systems - medicine, politics, economy,
government, law, education, science etc. are all based on frauds. I'd
be hiding my head in the sand if I ignored JP or anybody who claims to
have a solution just because it doesn't fit in with current orthodoxy.
Logic and reason come into everything.
Answers to all problems exist. Some people have the answers and JP may
be one of those people.
Carole
"carole" <> wrote in message
news:
> The way I see it our current systems - medicine, politics, economy,
> government, law, education, science etc. are all based on frauds. I'd
> be hiding my head in the sand if I ignored JP or anybody who claims to
> have a solution just because it doesn't fit in with current orthodoxy.
>
> Logic and reason come into everything.
> Answers to all problems exist. Some people have the answers and JP may
> be one of those people.
>
Not at all, its mathematically provable (and generally well known) that
answers to all problems do NOT exist.
--
Tumbleweed
email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com
carole wrote:
> The way I see it our current systems - medicine, politics, economy,
> government, law, education, science etc. are all based on frauds. I'd
> be hiding my head in the sand if I ignored JP or anybody who claims to
> have a solution just because it doesn't fit in with current orthodoxy.
>
> Logic and reason come into everything.
> Answers to all problems exist. Some people have the answers and JP may
> be one of those people.
>
> Carole
>
>
If the stupid French turd has an answer the question must have been
really stupid ! Just like you !
I'm talking about the drought, dickhead.
Somebody probably knows something about what causes it - whether
clandestine weather modifications, HAARP, scalar technology discovered
by tesla 100 years ago, or other.
The trouble is people like you don't believe anything unless its
repeated on their television ad nauseum until it sinks through their
thick heads, but unfortunately most of it is propaganda.
But no use trying to explain that to you I suppose.
Go back to sleep.
Carole
On 16 Apr 2005 05:52:21 -0700, "carole" <>
wrote:
>I'm talking about the drought, dickhead.
>Somebody probably knows something about what causes it - whether
>clandestine weather modifications, HAARP, scalar technology discovered
>by tesla 100 years ago, or other.
Or maybe, Australia, having an incendiary climate, is being affected
by climate changes brought about completely unintentionally.
Bear in mind, that whilst it's undeniable that human activity has
changes the climate, the Earth naturally goes through ice ages, and
warmer periods than the one we are currently going through, and
there's nothing we can do about the Sun putting out more energy, as it
inevitably will do.
Of course, It might be the lizard aliens David Icke fakes about.
As far as *YOU* are concerned, it *HAS* to be a conspiracy.
You must live in an interesting environment.
How do you stop the government monitoring what you buy every time you
go to the supermarket?
>The trouble is people like you don't believe anything unless its
>repeated on their television ad nauseum until it sinks through their
>thick heads, but unfortunately most of it is propaganda.
The trouble with people like you, is that you think Nexus Magazine has
anything honest to say, and *everything* is a huge conspiracy, which
you "successfully" manage to expose without any danger whatsoever.
Try buying a science magazine once or twice.
>But no use trying to explain that to you I suppose.
And no use trying to get you to recognise the mental acrobatics you
need to perform to maintain your reality bubble, credophile.
>Go back to sleep.
>
>Carole
>
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
"carole" <> wrote in message
news:
> I'm talking about the drought, dickhead.
> Somebody probably knows something about what causes it - whether
> clandestine weather modifications, HAARP, scalar technology discovered
> by tesla 100 years ago, or other.
> The trouble is people like you don't believe anything unless its
> repeated on their television ad nauseum until it sinks through their
> thick heads, but unfortunately most of it is propaganda.
> But no use trying to explain that to you I suppose.
And people like you believe everything except that which can actually be
demonstrated to be true. As Bertrand Russell said "It is important to have
an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out."
> Go back to sleep.
I will sleep tonight, but I don't know how you can when the men in black
suits could be knocking on your door at any moment, because you know too
much.
>
> Carole
>
>
Cheers
Jason
It is also possible that Australia's climate has been like this for a long
time and that we have been rather fortunate that most of the last two
hundred years has been favourable to our way of doing things. Coral cores
from the great barrier reef suggest this.
Mind you, the following are facts (I use the word deliberately): (1) levels
of CO2 and CH4, among others, in the atmosphere do affect the amount of heat
that is re-radiated back into space from the earth; and (2) levels of these
gases have risen since industrialisation, including the industrialisation of
food production (feed lots etc). Therefore, it follows that human activity
will *most probably* affect climate. Most scientists agree, although not
all do and science is not popularity contest admittedly. However, it seems
to me that the potential cost of ignoring this probability and not cutting
emissions outweighs the cost of doing so. Actually, that seems so
blindingly obvious to me that I find it hard to fathom why our government
won't see it.
Your point about natural fluctuations is also probably true, though it is
hard to tell whether this is the cause of any "extreme" weather we may
experience now, or whether it is due to CO2 levels, or neither. However, we
can't change natural fluctuations and we can change gas levels. So we
should.
BTW didn't you know the 12 ft tall lizards write the science magazines as
well? :-)
Cheers
Jason
"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
message news:
> On 16 Apr 2005 05:52:21 -0700, "carole" <>
> wrote:
>
> >I'm talking about the drought, dickhead.
> >Somebody probably knows something about what causes it - whether
> >clandestine weather modifications, HAARP, scalar technology discovered
> >by tesla 100 years ago, or other.
>
> Or maybe, Australia, having an incendiary climate, is being affected
> by climate changes brought about completely unintentionally.
>
> Bear in mind, that whilst it's undeniable that human activity has
> changes the climate, the Earth naturally goes through ice ages, and
> warmer periods than the one we are currently going through, and
> there's nothing we can do about the Sun putting out more energy, as it
> inevitably will do.
>
> Of course, It might be the lizard aliens David Icke fakes about.
>
> As far as *YOU* are concerned, it *HAS* to be a conspiracy.
>
> You must live in an interesting environment.
> How do you stop the government monitoring what you buy every time you
> go to the supermarket?
>
>
>
>
>
> >The trouble is people like you don't believe anything unless its
> >repeated on their television ad nauseum until it sinks through their
> >thick heads, but unfortunately most of it is propaganda.
>
> The trouble with people like you, is that you think Nexus Magazine has
> anything honest to say, and *everything* is a huge conspiracy, which
> you "successfully" manage to expose without any danger whatsoever.
>
> Try buying a science magazine once or twice.
>
> >But no use trying to explain that to you I suppose.
>
> And no use trying to get you to recognise the mental acrobatics you
> need to perform to maintain your reality bubble, credophile.
>
> >Go back to sleep.
> >
> >Carole
> >
>
> --
>
> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
>
>
> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:30:41 +1000, "Jas" <jason Dot smith AT @
ihatespam tpg dot com dot au> wrote:
>It is also possible that Australia's climate has been like this for a long
>time and that we have been rather fortunate that most of the last two
>hundred years has been favourable to our way of doing things. Coral cores
>from the great barrier reef suggest this.
>Mind you, the following are facts (I use the word deliberately): (1) levels
>of CO2 and CH4, among others, in the atmosphere do affect the amount of heat
>that is re-radiated back into space from the earth; and (2) levels of these
>gases have risen since industrialisation, including the industrialisation of
>food production (feed lots etc). Therefore, it follows that human activity
>will *most probably* affect climate. Most scientists agree, although not
>all do and science is not popularity contest admittedly. However, it seems
>to me that the potential cost of ignoring this probability and not cutting
>emissions outweighs the cost of doing so. Actually, that seems so
>blindingly obvious to me that I find it hard to fathom why our government
>won't see it.
>Your point about natural fluctuations is also probably true, though it is
>hard to tell whether this is the cause of any "extreme" weather we may
>experience now, or whether it is due to CO2 levels, or neither. However, we
>can't change natural fluctuations and we can change gas levels. So we
>should.
Agreed absolutely. However, sometimes I think we are just all doing a
"King Canute" :-)
>
>BTW didn't you know the 12 ft tall lizards write the science magazines as
>well? :-)
>
>Cheers
>Jason
>"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
>message news:
>> On 16 Apr 2005 05:52:21 -0700, "carole" <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I'm talking about the drought, dickhead.
>> >Somebody probably knows something about what causes it - whether
>> >clandestine weather modifications, HAARP, scalar technology discovered
>> >by tesla 100 years ago, or other.
>>
>> Or maybe, Australia, having an incendiary climate, is being affected
>> by climate changes brought about completely unintentionally.
>>
>> Bear in mind, that whilst it's undeniable that human activity has
>> changes the climate, the Earth naturally goes through ice ages, and
>> warmer periods than the one we are currently going through, and
>> there's nothing we can do about the Sun putting out more energy, as it
>> inevitably will do.
>>
>> Of course, It might be the lizard aliens David Icke fakes about.
>>
>> As far as *YOU* are concerned, it *HAS* to be a conspiracy.
>>
>> You must live in an interesting environment.
>> How do you stop the government monitoring what you buy every time you
>> go to the supermarket?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >The trouble is people like you don't believe anything unless its
>> >repeated on their television ad nauseum until it sinks through their
>> >thick heads, but unfortunately most of it is propaganda.
>>
>> The trouble with people like you, is that you think Nexus Magazine has
>> anything honest to say, and *everything* is a huge conspiracy, which
>> you "successfully" manage to expose without any danger whatsoever.
>>
>> Try buying a science magazine once or twice.
>>
>> >But no use trying to explain that to you I suppose.
>>
>> And no use trying to get you to recognise the mental acrobatics you
>> need to perform to maintain your reality bubble, credophile.
>>
>> >Go back to sleep.
>> >
>> >Carole
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
>>
>>
>> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
>
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
I already said that one of the possibilities for weather change were
naturally occurring, although I don't think its the most likely reason.
>Of course, It might be the lizard aliens David Icke fakes about.
I can't bring myself to take that theory seriously.
>As far as *YOU* are concerned, it *HAS* to be a conspiracy.
Yes, I'd say weather changes are most likely a conspiracy.
>The trouble with people like you, is that you think Nexus Magazine has
anything honest to say, and *everything* is a huge conspiracy, which
you "successfully" manage to expose without any danger whatsoever.
Yes, I think Nexus magazine has some good stories.
>Try buying a science magazine once or twice.
Why should I?
>And no use trying to get you to recognise the mental acrobatics you
need to perform to maintain your reality bubble, credophile.
No, I used to put my credibility on hold to believe all the stories we
get dished up by the powers that be. "Oh, is that the reason", "it must
be true if the experts tell us it is" etc.
But all the time nothing really adds up, and things just keep getting
more and more outrageous and out of hand.
Once I became a conspiracy theorist it was a huge relief on my mind,
even although it raised a lot of questions that I had no answers for.
But I don't expect to get them from the current system which spends
massive amounts of money to keep the public misinformed.
Looks like you are a marvellous testament to their handiwork.
Carole
"carole" <> wrote in message
news:
>I already said that one of the possibilities for weather change were
> naturally occurring, although I don't think its the most likely reason.
>
>>Of course, It might be the lizard aliens David Icke fakes about.
>
> I can't bring myself to take that theory seriously.
>
>>As far as *YOU* are concerned, it *HAS* to be a conspiracy.
>
> Yes, I'd say weather changes are most likely a conspiracy.
>
>>The trouble with people like you, is that you think Nexus Magazine has
>
> anything honest to say, and *everything* is a huge conspiracy, which
> you "successfully" manage to expose without any danger whatsoever.
>
> Yes, I think Nexus magazine has some good stories.
>
>>Try buying a science magazine once or twice.
>
> Why should I?
>
>>And no use trying to get you to recognise the mental acrobatics you
> need to perform to maintain your reality bubble, credophile.
>
> No, I used to put my credibility on hold to believe all the stories we
> get dished up by the powers that be. "Oh, is that the reason", "it must
> be true if the experts tell us it is" etc.
> But all the time nothing really adds up, and things just keep getting
> more and more outrageous and out of hand.
> Once I became a conspiracy theorist it was a huge relief on my mind,
> even although it raised a lot of questions that I had no answers for.
> But I don't expect to get them from the current system which spends
> massive amounts of money to keep the public misinformed.
> Looks like you are a marvellous testament to their handiwork.
Conspiracies require intelligence, planning and co-ordination, which are in
very short supply.
Ignorance and stupidity are far more probable causes.
Izzy
How can a government that can't even organise a decent invasion without
stuffing things up manage something as complicated as a drought?
"carole" <> wrote in message
news:
> I already said that one of the possibilities for weather change were
> naturally occurring, although I don't think its the most likely reason.
>
> >Of course, It might be the lizard aliens David Icke fakes about.
>
> I can't bring myself to take that theory seriously.
>
> >As far as *YOU* are concerned, it *HAS* to be a conspiracy.
>
> Yes, I'd say weather changes are most likely a conspiracy.
>
> >The trouble with people like you, is that you think Nexus Magazine has
>
> anything honest to say, and *everything* is a huge conspiracy, which
> you "successfully" manage to expose without any danger whatsoever.
>
> Yes, I think Nexus magazine has some good stories.
>
> >Try buying a science magazine once or twice.
>
> Why should I?
>
> >And no use trying to get you to recognise the mental acrobatics you
> need to perform to maintain your reality bubble, credophile.
>
> No, I used to put my credibility on hold to believe all the stories we
> get dished up by the powers that be. "Oh, is that the reason", "it must
> be true if the experts tell us it is" etc.
> But all the time nothing really adds up, and things just keep getting
> more and more outrageous and out of hand.
> Once I became a conspiracy theorist it was a huge relief on my mind,
> even although it raised a lot of questions that I had no answers for.
> But I don't expect to get them from the current system which spends
> massive amounts of money to keep the public misinformed.
> Looks like you are a marvellous testament to their handiwork.
>
> Carole
>
>
Operation Mockingbird, The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA
"In the 1950s, outlays for global propaganda climbed to a full third of
the CIA's covert operations budget. Some 3, 000 salaried and
contract
CIA employees were eventually engaged in propaganda efforts. The
cost
of disinforming the world cost American taxpayers an estimated $265
million a year by 1978, a budget larger than the combined
expenditures
of Reuters, UPI and the AP news syndicates.
Who owns the media?
In 1985, there were 50 companies who owned media outlets. The graph on
this site shows that between then and now, the number has dwindled to
only six, and if the planned deregulation goes through it'll decline
even further. Includes the major media reform advocacy groups.
Why so much interference in people's thinking?
What do they want to keep suppressed?
Why are they trying to control everything and everybody?
If it wasn't true they wouldn't be trying to suppress it.
They are obviously trying to mind control every person on the planet
into thinking something that isn't true.
Carole
On 20 Apr 2005 07:49:32 -0700, "carole" <>
wrote:
>
>If it wasn't true they wouldn't be trying to suppress it.
>They are obviously trying to mind control every person on the planet
>into thinking something that isn't true.
And yet you and many other chicken littles can cluck away to your
hearts content. Go figure.
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
message news:
> On 20 Apr 2005 07:49:32 -0700, "carole" <>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >If it wasn't true they wouldn't be trying to suppress it.
> >They are obviously trying to mind control every person on the planet
> >into thinking something that isn't true.
>
> And yet you and many other chicken littles can cluck away to your
> hearts content. Go figure.
>
>
> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
>
>
> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
George W is a christian and he thinks its ok to turn Iraq into a blood bath.
Is Little Pebble a more dangerous cult than Bush's christianity?
Carole
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:48:24 +1000, "Carole Hubbard"
<> wrote:
>
>"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
>message news:
>> On 20 Apr 2005 07:49:32 -0700, "carole" <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >If it wasn't true they wouldn't be trying to suppress it.
>> >They are obviously trying to mind control every person on the planet
>> >into thinking something that isn't true.
>>
>> And yet you and many other chicken littles can cluck away to your
>> hearts content. Go figure.
>>
>>
>> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
>>
>>
>> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
>
>George W is a christian and he thinks its ok to turn Iraq into a blood bath.
>Is Little Pebble a more dangerous cult than Bush's christianity?
I'm not an American citizen, so I cannot vote against Bush. I *can*
however, do something about William Kamm. I do so.
You just bleat, and pretend *everything* is a conspiracy.
Now, please explain why there are all these vast conspiracies, chicken
little, and how there are all these dangerous sekrit groups that want
to suppress the information that you collect on your webshite, and yet
you are able to speak on them with impunity.
Can't? No, you can't explain it, because that would prick your
reality bubble.
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
message news:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:48:24 +1000, "Carole Hubbard"
> <> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
> >message news:
> >> On 20 Apr 2005 07:49:32 -0700, "carole" <>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >If it wasn't true they wouldn't be trying to suppress it.
> >> >They are obviously trying to mind control every person on the planet
> >> >into thinking something that isn't true.
> >>
> >> And yet you and many other chicken littles can cluck away to your
> >> hearts content. Go figure.
> >>
> >>
> >> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
> >>
> >>
> >> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
> >
> >George W is a christian and he thinks its ok to turn Iraq into a blood
bath.
> >Is Little Pebble a more dangerous cult than Bush's christianity?
>
>
> I'm not an American citizen, so I cannot vote against Bush. I *can*
> however, do something about William Kamm. I do so.
>
> You just bleat, and pretend *everything* is a conspiracy.
Yes so ...am I wrong?
> Now, please explain why there are all these vast conspiracies, chicken
> little, and how there are all these dangerous sekrit groups that want
> to suppress the information that you collect on your webshite, and yet
> you are able to speak on them with impunity.
Because we haven't reached a complete police takeover state yet?
We still have the semblance of free speech, on the internet that is, but not
in the mass media or in education.
I was a whistleblower of some sort though, like a person with inside
firsthand experience, I might find myself in a difficult position if I
opened my mouth. What I say is heresay and not as significant.
> Can't? No, you can't explain it, because that would prick your
> reality bubble.
My reality bubble ... what about yours? To deny things are going on when
they are, surely points to a state of mental aberration. And your website is
chock full of trivia, little pebble is a joke.
> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
>
>
> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
Carole
On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:54 +1000, "Carole" <>
wrote:
>"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
>message news:
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:48:24 +1000, "Carole Hubbard"
>> <> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
>> >message news:
>> >> On 20 Apr 2005 07:49:32 -0700, "carole" <>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >If it wasn't true they wouldn't be trying to suppress it.
>> >> >They are obviously trying to mind control every person on the planet
>> >> >into thinking something that isn't true.
>> >>
>> >> And yet you and many other chicken littles can cluck away to your
>> >> hearts content. Go figure.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
>> >
>> >George W is a christian and he thinks its ok to turn Iraq into a blood
>bath.
>> >Is Little Pebble a more dangerous cult than Bush's christianity?
>>
>>
>> I'm not an American citizen, so I cannot vote against Bush. I *can*
>> however, do something about William Kamm. I do so.
>>
>> You just bleat, and pretend *everything* is a conspiracy.
>
>Yes so ...am I wrong?
Yes.
>
>> Now, please explain why there are all these vast conspiracies, chicken
>> little, and how there are all these dangerous sekrit groups that want
>> to suppress the information that you collect on your webshite, and yet
>> you are able to speak on them with impunity.
>
>Because we haven't reached a complete police takeover state yet?
>We still have the semblance of free speech, on the internet that is, but not
>in the mass media or in education.
>I was a whistleblower of some sort though, like a person with inside
>firsthand experience, I might find myself in a difficult position if I
>opened my mouth. What I say is heresay and not as significant.
That's true. What you say *IS* insignificant, chicken little
>
>> Can't? No, you can't explain it, because that would prick your
>> reality bubble.
>
>My reality bubble ... what about yours? To deny things are going on when
>they are, surely points to a state of mental aberration.
And to get your entire idea of how the world works from crap magazines
like nexus, is plain dumb, chicken little.
> And your website is
>chock full of trivia, little pebble is a joke.
You mean you took 3 weeks to come up with something as lame as that?
BWAAHHAHAHHA
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
Not only you are stupid, Walrus !
.... and we all know that.
Not only you are a sick old man, and ugly to boost !
.... and this common knowledge in your astronomy little club !
Not only you are a clueless Kook !
.... so much indeed than any run-of-mill bush Emu leaves you dead on IQ test
!
But as well you have no manners, and behave indeed as a boor !
I want you to immediately apologise to Carole !
Remember, if you don't do it now, tomorrow it may be too late considering
the state of your heart & arteries.
... therefore just act while you still have time, DORK !
Posthumously apologies are always suspect in my book, and rightly so might
be refused !
No regards
--
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Discoverer and Rightful Owner of the Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines
The Great Sandy Desert of Australia
Founder of the True Geology
~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~
"Wally AngleseaT" <> a écrit dans
le message de news:
"snipped the delirious rant for decency sake "
"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
message news:
> On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:54 +1000, "Carole" <>
> wrote:
>
> >"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote in
> >message news:
> >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:48:24 +1000, "Carole Hubbard"
> >> <> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Wally AngleseaT" <> wrote
in
> >> >message news:
> >> >> On 20 Apr 2005 07:49:32 -0700, "carole" <>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >If it wasn't true they wouldn't be trying to suppress it.
> >> >> >They are obviously trying to mind control every person on the
planet
> >> >> >into thinking something that isn't true.
> >> >>
> >> >> And yet you and many other chicken littles can cluck away to your
> >> >> hearts content. Go figure.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
> >> >
> >> >George W is a christian and he thinks its ok to turn Iraq into a blood
> >bath.
> >> >Is Little Pebble a more dangerous cult than Bush's christianity?
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm not an American citizen, so I cannot vote against Bush. I *can*
> >> however, do something about William Kamm. I do so.
> >>
> >> You just bleat, and pretend *everything* is a conspiracy.
> >
> >Yes so ...am I wrong?
>
> Yes.
You're an ostrich Wal - with no guts. Because it takes guts to look truth in
the face and you can't do it.
> >> Now, please explain why there are all these vast conspiracies, chicken
> >> little, and how there are all these dangerous sekrit groups that want
> >> to suppress the information that you collect on your webshite, and yet
> >> you are able to speak on them with impunity.
> >
> >Because we haven't reached a complete police takeover state yet?
> >We still have the semblance of free speech, on the internet that is, but
not
> >in the mass media or in education.
> >I was a whistleblower of some sort though, like a person with inside
> >firsthand experience, I might find myself in a difficult position if I
> >opened my mouth. What I say is heresay and not as significant.
>
> That's true. What you say *IS* insignificant, chicken little
And what you say is LESS than significant ostrich Wal.
> >> Can't? No, you can't explain it, because that would prick your
> >> reality bubble.
> >
> >My reality bubble ... what about yours? To deny things are going on when
> >they are, surely points to a state of mental aberration.
>
> And to get your entire idea of how the world works from crap magazines
> like nexus, is plain dumb, chicken little.
Nexus has some good articles from time to time, especially on weather
control, manmade earthquakes, and free energy!
> > And your website is
> >chock full of trivia, little pebble is a joke.
>
> You mean you took 3 weeks to come up with something as lame as that?
> BWAAHHAHAHHA
Three weeks? I've seen it the first time I looked at your website ( whenever
that was ).
What about you - you say everything isn't a conspiracy with no
explanation ---get real Wal!
Stop smelling the daisies and come down to earth for once in your miserable
existence and admit the truth.
> Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
>
>
> "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
Carole
"Denial ain't just a river in Egypt." - Mark Twain (1835-1910)
"Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud" <> wrote in message
news:4286417c$0$26066$
> Not only you are stupid, Walrus !
> ... and we all know that.
> Not only you are a sick old man, and ugly to boost !
> ... and this common knowledge in your astronomy little club !
> Not only you are a clueless Kook !
> ... so much indeed than any run-of-mill bush Emu leaves you dead on IQ
test
> !
>
> But as well you have no manners, and behave indeed as a boor !
>
> I want you to immediately apologise to Carole !
> Remember, if you don't do it now, tomorrow it may be too late considering
> the state of your heart & arteries.
> .. therefore just act while you still have time, DORK !
>
> Posthumously apologies are always suspect in my book, and rightly so might
> be refused !
>
> No regards
>
> --
> Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
> Australia Mining Pioneer
>
> Discoverer and Rightful Owner of the Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines
> The Great Sandy Desert of Australia
>
> Founder of the True Geology
>
> ~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~
>
> "Wally AngleseaT" <> a écrit
dans
> le message de news:
> "snipped the delirious rant for decency sake "
>
Thanks for the attempt Jean-Paul, its appreciated - really.
However, I have to face the fact that its business as usual now that you are
leaving aus.ng's.
The rabble will be all in again, fighting and abusing, heckling and shoving
others aside like pigs at a trough.
Never mind, it was fun while it lasted.
Hope you find something meaningful to get stuck into.
All the best
Fond regards
Carole
>