Bookmarks

Yahoo Gmail Google Facebook Delicious Twitter Reddit Stumpleupon Myspace Digg

Search queries

wwwchildsexcom, conradelektronik detektiv anwesend?, pro vorsorge plus 4u liberty Europe fonds, einkommensteuervorauszahlung in skr03 buchen, einkommensteuer vorauszahlung buchen skr 04, was bedeutet über eine etwaige verrechnung des restguthabens mit gegenansprüchen erhalten sie eine besondere mitteilung, daumenschiene auto fahren, bverwverfg, steuerbescheid verrechnung des restguthabens mit gegenabsprüchen, verzugszinsen deliktsrecht

Links

XODOX
Impressum

#1: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-10 23:00:17 by the_sarp

Does anyone know anything about this company?

Do they have an exclusive patent?

Will the ScanDisk deal be significant?

Opinions on LQMT's management?

Does it have significant competition?

Is it really necessary or economically feasible to house flash drives
in metal three times harder than titanium? Will customers pay the
extra?

opinions gratefully received

the sarp

P.S. this is a "stock" forum, not and "insult" forum. this specific
thread should hopefully be about LQMT.

Report this message

#2: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-11 05:00:36 by Carolyn

why not try www.liquidmetal.com?
just a thought.........
carolyn



sarp wrote:
> Does anyone know anything about this company?
>
> Do they have an exclusive patent?
>
> Will the ScanDisk deal be significant?
>
> Opinions on LQMT's management?
>
> Does it have significant competition?
>
> Is it really necessary or economically feasible to house flash drives
> in metal three times harder than titanium? Will customers pay the
> extra?
>
> opinions gratefully received
>
> the sarp
>
> P.S. this is a "stock" forum, not and "insult" forum. this specific
> thread should hopefully be about LQMT.
>

Report this message

#3: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-11 06:11:46 by the_sarp

Carolyn wrote:
> why not try www.liquidmetal.com?
> just a thought.........
> carolyn
>

carolyn:

you mean the company's own website?

we can certainly learn something about it there.

But we might not get the kind of objective analysis that a good
investor needs.

Theoretically, pooling our insights here might be one of the advantages
of a forum like this.

Do you know anything else about LQMT?

the sarp

Report this message

#4: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-11 10:46:14 by Arthur

What about the yahoo msg boards?
Yeh lots of crap pro and con but you can at least get a feel for which
way the tree might fall.

I looked at their site and get a different view of their business than
you express. I have no idea how a liquid will fly.

a
==

On 10 Mar 2006 21:11:46 -0800, &quot;sarp&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:the_sarp&#64;yahoo.com" target="_blank">the_sarp&#64;yahoo.com</a>&gt; wrote:
&gt;
&gt;you mean the company's own website?
&gt;
&gt;we can certainly learn something about it there.
&gt;
&gt;But we might not get the kind of objective analysis that a good
&gt;investor needs.
&gt;
&gt;Theoretically, pooling our insights here might be one of the advantages
&gt;of a forum like this.
&gt;
&gt;Do you know anything else about LQMT?
&gt;the sarp

Report this message

#5: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-11 11:50:55 by ausound

&quot;sarp&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:the_sarp&#64;yahoo.com" target="_blank">the_sarp&#64;yahoo.com</a>&gt; wrote in news:1142028017.647918.123370
@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:

&gt; Does anyone know anything about this company?
&gt;
&gt; Do they have an exclusive patent?
&gt;
&gt; Will the ScanDisk deal be significant?
&gt;
&gt; Opinions on LQMT's management?
&gt;
&gt; Does it have significant competition?
&gt;
&gt; Is it really necessary or economically feasible to house flash drives
&gt; in metal three times harder than titanium? Will customers pay the
&gt; extra?
&gt;
&gt; opinions gratefully received
&gt;
&gt; the sarp
&gt;
&gt; P.S. this is a &quot;stock&quot; forum, not and &quot;insult&quot; forum. this specific
&gt; thread should hopefully be about LQMT.
&gt;

revenue is on a sequential tear:

12/31/05 09/30/05 06/30/05 03/31/05

Revenue 5,453 4,342 3,727 2,843


and although they continue to lose $ thru operations:


Loss/
operations (2,568) (1,974) (5,409) (2,979)



because of the mysterious black art of accounting
(and from consistant benefits of exchange rate):

value of
warrants,
net 2,840 1,112 (100) 133

beneficial
conversion
feature 2,867 982 - -

Foreign
exchange
222 (306) 62 321


they've managed to become net positive

net per share
basic and diluted
0.04 (0.08) (0.15) (0.10)


really upbeat guidance as well:

John Kang, Chairman of Liquidmetal Technologies stated, &quot;We are very
pleased with the revenue growth during the fourth quarter. Our 28% growth
exceeded the 20% growth that we had targeted at the company. We saw solid
development in our business as both segments of our business saw good
demand growth. This follows a solid third quarter growth as well. We are
very encouraged by our increased revenues and expect this trend to
continue. We experienced good growth in the orders from our key customers,
Samsung, SanDisk, Vertu and Motorola throughout the quarter. The most
significant of the orders was the order for antennas from Motorola. This
was a project that we have been working on for close to a year. We finally
received the purchase order and put it into production in December. This
marks a new major product category for us. We expect an increase in
business as these key customers will be continuing with the projects they
currently have and will be adding new projects in the coming quarters.&quot;

Bulk Alloy revenues were $3.5 million for the fourth quarter compared to
$2.8 million in the third quarter, an increase of $0.7 million, which is
primarily attributable to the introduction of new products by its
customers. Loss before interest expense, discontinued operations,
impairment of long lived assets and expensing of options was $0.3 million
compared to $0.6 million in the prior quarter.

Coatings revenues were $2.0 million for the fourth quarter compared to $1.5
million in the prior quarter, showing growth of 33% in business. Income
before interest expense and discontinued operations was $0.6 million
compared to $0.4 million in the prior quarter, which also shows stable
profitability.

During the quarter, selling general and administrative costs was $2.0
million compared to $2.4 million in the third quarter, a decrease of $0.4
million or 17%. This decrease was due primarily to company's efforts to
manage costs. Research and development costs came in at $0.3 million
compared to $0.2 million in the third quarter.

The Company had a loss from operation of $2.6 million in the fourth quarter
vs $2.0 for the third quarter, an increase of $0.6 million which was due to
an impairment charge of $1.1 million for inventory of raw material which is
not expected to be used within the next 12 months.

While having an operating loss, the company had a net income of $1.7
million in the fourth quarter compared to a net loss of $2.3 million in the
third quarter. This was mainly due to an accounting treatment for the
beneficial conversion feature of the convertible notes issued in the third
quarter of this year. Accounting for this feature will also cause a
positive restatement to the third quarter financial results of $1.0 million
which will be amended to reflect this item.

Report this message

#6: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-11 13:34:47 by bartonmj

Have you tried listening to their conference call?

JMHO

Report this message

#7: Re: Opinions on LQMT Barto

Posted on 2006-03-11 22:46:00 by the_sarp

<a href="mailto:bartonmj&#64;webtv.net" target="_blank">bartonmj&#64;webtv.net</a> wrote:
&gt; Have you tried listening to their conference call?
&gt;
&gt; JMHO

Have you?

If so, how did it help you?

You are bullish on the stock, so what did you learn?

the sarp

Report this message

#8: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-11 23:07:31 by the_sarp

ausound:

if only accounting magic gave them a net gain, this is not a hopeful
sign.

May I ask you why some of your figures are in parentheses?

the sarp
++++++++++



ausound wrote:
&gt;
&gt; and although they continue to lose $ thru operations:
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Loss/
&gt; operations (2,568) (1,974) (5,409) (2,979)
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; because of the mysterious black art of accounting
&gt; (and from consistant benefits of exchange rate):
&gt;
&gt;
.....
&gt; they've managed to become net positive
&gt;
&gt; net per share
&gt; basic and diluted
&gt; 0.04 (0.08) (0.15) (0.10)
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; really upbeat guidance as well:
&gt;
.....
&gt;John Kang says:...
&gt; While having an operating loss, the company had a net income of $1.7
&gt; million in the fourth quarter compared to a net loss of $2.3 million in the
&gt; third quarter. This was mainly due to an accounting treatment for the
&gt; beneficial conversion feature of the convertible notes issued in the third
&gt; quarter of this year. ....

Report this message

#9: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-11 23:20:46 by Arthur

This is a junk stock traded in the back offices. LQMT.OB
Let us know when and if you care to discuss anything other than penny
stocks, bankrupt companies, and toilet paper.

Try one of the FIVE ( 5 ) penny stock groups as yahoo does not even
have a message board for this crap. You might also try contacting the
company if you can get off your ass. What do we look like. Your
personal gopher?

F. U.

There is that direct enough for you?

arthur
=======

On 10 Mar 2006 14:00:17 -0800, &quot;sarp&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:the_sarp&#64;yahoo.com" target="_blank">the_sarp&#64;yahoo.com</a>&gt; wrote:

&gt;Does anyone know anything about this company?
&gt;Do they have an exclusive patent?
&gt;Will the ScanDisk deal be significant?
&gt;Opinions on LQMT's management?
&gt;Does it have significant competition?
&gt;
&gt;Is it really necessary or economically feasible to house flash drives
&gt;in metal three times harder than titanium? Will customers pay the
&gt;extra?
&gt;
&gt;opinions gratefully received
&gt;the sarp
&gt;P.S. this is a &quot;stock&quot; forum, not and &quot;insult&quot; forum. this specific
&gt;thread should hopefully be about LQMT.

Report this message

#10: Re: Opinions on LQMT Barto

Posted on 2006-03-12 02:07:16 by bartonmj

&gt;Have you?

&gt;If so, how did it help you?

&gt;You are bullish on the stock, so what did you learn?

&gt;the sarp


Of course, I listen to the conference calls of my longs, and companies I
need to do d.d. on.

Report this message

#11: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-12 13:34:13 by the_sarp

arthur wrote:
&gt; This is a junk stock traded in the back offices. LQMT.OB
&gt; Let us know when and if you care to discuss anything other than penny
&gt; stocks, bankrupt companies, and toilet paper.
&gt;
&gt; Try one of the FIVE ( 5 ) penny stock groups as yahoo does not even
&gt; have a message board for this crap. You might also try contacting the
&gt; company if you can get off your ass. What do we look like. Your
&gt; personal gopher?
&gt;
&gt; F. U.
&gt;
&gt; There is that direct enough for you?
&gt;
&gt; arthur
&gt; =======


If you don't want to talk about LQMT, don't post in this thread.

bye arthur

the sarp
Post Count 2,098,065,001

Report this message

#12: Re: Opinions on LQMT Barto

Posted on 2006-03-12 13:35:53 by the_sarp

<a href="mailto:bartonmj&#64;webtv.net" target="_blank">bartonmj&#64;webtv.net</a> wrote:
&gt;
&gt; Of course, I listen to the conference calls of my longs, and companies I
&gt; need to do d.d. on.

if you believe in it, that's good enough for me

the sarp

Report this message

#13: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-12 18:04:04 by Don S

sarp wrote:

&gt;Carolyn wrote:
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;&gt;why not try www.liquidmetal.com?
&gt;&gt;just a thought.........
&gt;&gt;carolyn
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;
&gt;carolyn:
&gt;
&gt;you mean the company's own website?
&gt;
&gt;we can certainly learn something about it there.
&gt;
&gt;But we might not get the kind of objective analysis that a good
&gt;investor needs.
&gt;
&gt;Theoretically, pooling our insights here might be one of the advantages
&gt;of a forum like this.
&gt;
&gt;Do you know anything else about LQMT?
&gt;
&gt;the sarp
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
Gaud I love it when someone knows every thing. The company web site may
have pointers to there fillings with the SEC, there could be some facts
of interest posted, you might get a fair idea of what the company does,
over all it does not sound like a bad place to start an investigation.

Report this message

#14: Re: Opinions on LQMT Barto

Posted on 2006-03-12 19:03:04 by Don S

sarp wrote:

&gt;<a href="mailto:bartonmj&#64;webtv.net" target="_blank">bartonmj&#64;webtv.net</a> wrote:
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;&gt;Of course, I listen to the conference calls of my longs, and companies I
&gt;&gt;need to do d.d. on.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;
&gt;if you believe in it, that's good enough for me
&gt;
&gt;the sarp
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
Hey I got this bridge in Brooklyn that I will part with real cheap.

Report this message

#15: Re: Opinions on LQMT

Posted on 2006-03-12 22:48:56 by Arthur

Don, Unfortunately that requires non physical effort which is shunned
in HS in favor of rope climbing in the gym.

a
==

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:04:04 GMT, Don S
&gt;&gt;
&gt;Gaud I love it when someone knows every thing. The company web site may
&gt;have pointers to there fillings with the SEC, there could be some facts
&gt;of interest posted, you might get a fair idea of what the company does,
&gt;over all it does not sound like a bad place to start an investigation.

Report this message