Stock Pullback Method

The Stock Pullback Method -


www.collective2.com/go/stockpullback


I trade stocks (as well as index futures) full-time. Utilizing many
years of trading experience, I have developed a unique system that is
now available to the public beginning August '05. The results of this
system are tracked in real time by a 3rd party rating service.


After a great deal of research, and real life trading experience, I
have found a way to identify stocks in which the "right" pullback may
have already happened, and enter before its next move.


To consistently identify the best stock entries, I have created the
"Stock Pullback Method" and have made it into an easy to follow system.



Trading system goals:


- Less time in the market(1-2 day avg), less "risk"
- High Win %
- High Win to Loss ratio
- High "Sharpe Ratio"
- Effective trade management
- Outperform the S&P 500


To review the details of this system and its recent performance, just
copy and paste the link below:


www.collective2.com/go/stockpullback


This link also provides access to a 14 day free trial subscription!

Re: Stock Pullback Method

Your system must be failing you if you are doing the PT Barnum thing on
usenet.

Re: Stock Pullback Method

I invite you to see the real time results for yourself of the Stock
Pullback Method. The results are continually tracked by a 3rd party
rating service.

www.collective2.com/go/stockpullback

Re: Stock Pullback Method

"www.Independenttrading.com" <> wrote in message
news:
>I invite you to see the real time results for yourself of the Stock
> Pullback Method. The results are continually tracked by a 3rd party
> rating service.
>
> www.collective2.com/go/stockpullback

Ok, I looked, this is what I found:
"Since you are not a subscriber to this system, we show only closed trades
below."

Those closed trades are not real time. They a probably fake.
Who's the 3rd party rating service, your brother?

Anyone that pays you $40/month is out of their mind.
You have no reputation, no history available from a reputable source. All we
have is your word, that's funny.

This is just too funny.

Yummyville Pet Food


I don't think I want a dog food guy giving me advice for $40/month.
MUHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

If ever a single line said it all, this is it:
"Collective2 Corporation assumes no responsibility for the trading advice
published on this site."





"www.Independenttrading.com" <> wrote in message
news:
>I invite you to see the real time results for yourself of the Stock
> Pullback Method. The results are continually tracked by a 3rd party
> rating service.
>
> www.collective2.com/go/stockpullback
>

Arf, arf. Roll over Rover.

Do you taste test that dog food before you sell it?

Re: Arf, arf. Roll over Rover.

"Ed" <> wrote in message
news:
> Do you taste test that dog food before you sell it?
>

Be your own judge. MUHAHAHAHAHA!!!!



While it's true that dogs and humans have different nutritional requirements
and process some foods differently - differences that Yummyville takes into
account - dogs and humans enjoy many of the same foods, tastes, and flavors.

That's why we use only human-quality ingredients. You could eat any
Yummyville product yourself, and wouldn't have to worry about eating
anything disgusting. (No organ meats, no brains, no bone meal, no hair or
feathers or fur... Just top-quality beef or turkey.)

Delicious ingredients

The food tastes pretty decent to humans - but, remember, it's especially
designed to taste delicious to dogs. So, go ahead and try some if you like -
but you'll want to feed most of it to your dog.

Look at the list of ingredients for each variety of Yummyville to see how
wholesome and delicious it is:

Re: Arf, arf. Roll over Rover.

Gary C wrote:

>
>
> While it's true that dogs and humans have different nutritional requirements
> and process some foods differently - differences that Yummyville takes into
> account - dogs and humans enjoy many of the same foods, tastes, and flavors.
>
> That's why we use only human-quality ingredients.

Would that include actual humans? I have an uncle who may want to
know, in case his old WWII South Pacific dietary cravings ever return.

Re: Stock Pullback Method

Results as of October 7, 2005 - System Details: Stock Pullback Method


Trading System Results

Statistics are for combined open and closed positions. We assume a
starting account size of $100,000. Remember that real-time quotes vary
from moment-to-moment. The results in this table are updated on a
frequent, but periodic basis. This table was last updated on Sat Oct 8
06:17:15 2005. Therefore results here may differ slightly from
trade-by-trade details, which are based on real-time quotes.


Trades 51
Profitable 36
Losses 15
Win % 70.6%
Cumu $ $2,402
after typical commission $2,210
Avg Win $124
Avg Loss $138
W:L Ratio 2.2:1
P/L per unit ($0.99)
after typical commission ($1.04)
Avg Trade Length 1.1 days
Annualized % 21.92% over 40 days
Sharpe Ratio 2.224
Started Buy Power Cash Long Eqty Margined Open P/L
$100,000 $63,098 $63,092 $78,608 $78,603 $10


There are only subscription charges when the system is profitable.

Not interested in what you have to say.

It could be total fabrication. I repeat:
Anyone that pays you $40/month is out of their mind.
You have no reputation, no history available from a reputable source. All we
have is your word.

Re: Not interested in what you have to say.

ed, don't be so skeptical. this man, who apparently has made millions,
just wants to use up all of his free time making us millionaires. then
everyone will be rich and happy. these are the kind of people we need
to run our governmentt.

no alterior (sic) motives, no "good ol boy system" no favors asked and
none repaid. what a wonderful world this would be if we would all use
this system

.. personnaly, i have the same altruistic motives. within the next two
weeks i can make millionaires if people will buy my new fund which will
be announced in two weeks.. i know your check is already in the mail
from the results you have gained thru my neutronic secet fund reports
(remember this is confidential and only to be read by paying
subscribers). by the way, you are still ahead 10-1. neutron

ps; where can you find spell check on these and other e mail posts?
thanks

Re: Not interested in what you have to say.

"neutron" <> wrote in message
news:

>
> ps; where can you find spell check on these and other e mail posts?
> thanks
>

Re: Not interested in what you have to say.

"neutron" <> wrote

> ed, don't be so skeptical. this man, who apparently has made millions,
> just wants to use up all of his free time making us millionaires. then
> everyone will be rich and happy. these are the kind of people we need
> to run our governmentt.
>
> no alterior (sic) motives, no "good ol boy system" no favors asked and
> none repaid. what a wonderful world this would be if we would all use
> this system
>
> . personnaly, i have the same altruistic motives. within the next two
> weeks i can make millionaires if people will buy my new fund which will
> be announced in two weeks.. i know your check is already in the mail
> from the results you have gained thru my neutronic secet fund reports
> (remember this is confidential and only to be read by paying
> subscribers). by the way, you are still ahead 10-1. neutron
>
> ps; where can you find spell check on these and other e mail posts?
> thanks

My spell check doesn't work, but it's in the tools menu above if you are
using Outlook Express.

I'm looking forward to my first issue of that newsletter.

Re: Arf, arf. Roll over Rover.

Johnny Hageyama wrote:
> Would that include actual humans? I have an uncle who may want to
> know, in case his old WWII South Pacific dietary cravings ever return.

Yes. '...life, involving eating or being eaten by someone or
something.' - vorarephile.(dot)/hint/vulgate. I prefer Prescott's
History of Mexico.