TK. If you are ranking the portfolios please note that for "DavidOH"
Finance.Yahoo is using an old Sep 9 figure for the price for DXNS.L and
since then the price has dropped. This means the portfolio is
over-valued and should really be at 110,092 instead of the 110,987 stated.
David Wilkinson wrote:
> TK. If you are ranking the portfolios please note that for "DavidOH"
> Finance.Yahoo is using an old Sep 9 figure for the price for DXNS.L and
> since then the price has dropped. This means the portfolio is
> over-valued and should really be at 110,092 instead of the 110,987 stated.
I realise now why this is. The EPIC code has changed from DXNS.L to
DSGI.L as the company has changed its name from Dixons to DSG
International. I will see if I can find a way to change the code in
Finance.Yahoo. The number of shares stayed the same.
David Wilkinson wrote:
> David Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> TK. If you are ranking the portfolios please note that for "DavidOH"
>> Finance.Yahoo is using an old Sep 9 figure for the price for DXNS.L
>> and since then the price has dropped. This means the portfolio is
>> over-valued and should really be at 110,092 instead of the 110,987
>> stated.
>
>
> I realise now why this is. The EPIC code has changed from DXNS.L to
> DSGI.L as the company has changed its name from Dixons to DSG
> International. I will see if I can find a way to change the code in
> Finance.Yahoo. The number of shares stayed the same.
OK, I have deleted all the DXNS.L transactions and replaced them with
DSGI.L transactions with the same numbers and F.Y has updated to the
current DSGI.L price. The portfolio value is now correct.