Judge Alito's Investments

Contrast Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito's portfolio
allocation with those of other significant government
figures:

Nov. 30, on marketwatch.com:
---
Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito holds about $850,000 in
financial securities, with a net worth of about $1.72
million, according to documents filed with the Senate
Judiciary Committee released Wednesday.
....
Alito listed a personal residence worth $869,550 and Series
EE bonds worth $60,000.

Exxon Mobil (XOM) shares represent the largest single
holding, worth $161,000. Alito inherited the shares from an
unnamed family friend in 2004.

The bulk of Alito's holdings are in 10 Vanguard mutual
funds, totaling $523,500. Alito has been under fire by both
Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee
for not recusing himself while he was a federal appeals
judge in a case involving Vanguard funds.

He holds $101,000 in the Wellington Fund (VWELX), $96,000 in
the Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund (NAESX), $90,000 in the
Vanguard Intermediate Term Tax Exempt Fund (VWITX), $86,000
in the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTSMX) and
$76,500 in two Windsor II Fund (VWNFX) accounts.

He also owns $30,000 in the Vanguard N.J. Long Term Tax
Exempt Fund (VNJTX), $26,000 in the Vanguard Insured Long
Term Tax Exempt Fund (VILPX), and $18,000 in the Vanguard
Intermediate Term Bond Index Fund (VBILX). Alito also listed
holdings of $25,000 in the Star Fund (VGSTX).

He owns $29,400 in the Fidelity Equity Income Fund (FEQTX).

Alito also owns $25,200 in McDonald's Corp. shares (MCD),
$13,800 in Intel Corp. (INTC), $8,400 in Bristol-Myers
Squibb Co. (BMY) and $2,450 in the Walt Disney Co. (DIS).
---

At a glance, guy seems squared away. Nice to have non-family
friends who give you over $100k. I trust Senate aides are
checking for graft, though, on that one. Hopefully the guy
isn't too stupid.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Tess Millay wrote:
> Contrast Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito's portfolio
> allocation with those of other significant government
> figures:
> ---
> At a glance, guy seems squared away. Nice to have non-family
> friends who give you over $100k. I trust Senate aides are
> checking for graft, though, on that one. Hopefully the guy
> isn't too stupid.

There aren't any significant government figures, or is there an
otherliness about a list tangible assets. I see those whom don't like
his college affiliates, or what is significantly disposed to be a
common oversight when others recusing themselves intersect a crowded
docket; the $100K issue wouldn't seem to have the same prominence.
Looks to me like he's in a wheel of continued churning, after a
fashion, through protocols to screen for eventualities other than,
perhaps, gross stupidity. However, since certainy isn't enshrouded in
an overwhelming vote of confidence in statistical means, I'd best
quickly dispense with a couple of my own convictions for considered
stupidities, over an interim for approval.

-Alito is a disgusting pervert who believes that innocent ten-year old
girls should be forced to take off their clothes at the whim of the
government.

-Alito is in favor of police states that shoot suspects attempting to
flee, especially suspect women.

-Alito is not, nor has he solicited favor among women's civil rights
abortionist groups.

When law and duty are one, united by religion, your consciousness is
not individual. -FH

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Flasherly" <> wrote
> Tess Millay wrote:
> > Contrast Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito's portfolio
> > allocation with those of other significant government
> > figures:
> > ---
> > At a glance, guy seems squared away. Nice to have
non-family
> > friends who give you over $100k. I trust Senate aides
are
> > checking for graft, though, on that one. Hopefully the
guy
> > isn't too stupid.
>
> There aren't any significant government figures, or is
there an
> otherliness about a list tangible assets. I see those
whom don't like
> his college affiliates, or what is significantly disposed
to be a
> common oversight when others recusing themselves intersect
a crowded
> docket;

It would be a crime not to investigate why he didn't recuse
himself with the Vanguard cases.

> the $100K issue wouldn't seem to have the same prominence.
> Looks to me like he's in a wheel of continued churning,

Come on. His portfolio lacks any meaningful international
exposure, but otherwise he's got a reasonably diverse
portfolio. How can you call that churning?

bad writing deleted

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

> girls should be forced to take off their clothes at the whim of the
> government.
> -Alito is in favor of police states that shoot suspects attempting to
> -Alito is not, nor has he solicited favor among women's civil rights
> abortionist groups.

He also once filled a burlap bag with little kittens and smashed them
with a baseball bat.

I bet he's filibustered.

My prediction for 06.

-Mike

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Mike Stone" <> wrote
Flash
> > girls should be forced to take off their clothes at the
whim of the
> > government.
> > -Alito is in favor of police states that shoot suspects
attempting to
> > -Alito is not, nor has he solicited favor among women's
civil rights
> > abortionist groups.
>
> He also once filled a burlap bag with little kittens and
smashed them
> with a baseball bat.
>
> I bet he's filibustered.
>
> My prediction for 06.

Barring the announcement of more damning things than (1) his
1985 memo yada to dismantle Roe v. Wade step by step; (2)
the failure to recuse on the Vanguard cases; (3) his happy
affiliation with AFAIC a Princeton alumni group trying to
chase minorities out; and assuming he doesn't make a gaffe
or show arrogance in explaining these; my prediction is
he'll be confirmed by one of the slimmer votes in history.
Unfortunately. He was looking pretty good (to me, a Moderate
Democrat) until all this came out a month or so ago.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Tess Millay <> wrote:
>
> Barring the announcement of more damning things than (1) his
> 1985 memo yada to dismantle Roe v. Wade step by step; (2)
> the failure to recuse on the Vanguard cases; (3) his happy
> affiliation with AFAIC a Princeton alumni group trying to
> chase minorities out; and assuming he doesn't make a gaffe
> or show arrogance in explaining these; my prediction is
> he'll be confirmed by one of the slimmer votes in history.
> Unfortunately. He was looking pretty good (to me, a Moderate


He killed kittens. The man is toast!

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Mike Stone" <> wrote
> He killed kittens. The man is toast!

Something going around the blogs about which I should know?
I mean, are you being funny, or is there some truth to this
allegation of Alito commmitting kittencide?

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

>> He killed kittens. The man is toast!
>
> Something going around the blogs about which I should know?
> I mean, are you being funny, or is there some truth to this
> allegation of Alito commmitting kittencide?

No, I'm just making s*#)$! up right now.

It would be a good rumour to start though.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Tess Millay" <> wrote

> Barring the announcement of more damning things than (1) his
> 1985 memo yada to dismantle Roe v. Wade step by step

>I mean, are you being funny, or is there some truth to this
> allegation of Alito commmitting kittencide?


Hmmm, it's ok to kill babies but it's not ok to kill kittens.
Very interesting.

I hate cats. I love kids.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Ed <> wrote:

> Hmmm, it's ok to kill babies but it's not ok to kill kittens.
> Very interesting.

I have to agree with this. As much as I don't like Alito our abortion
laws are to the left of France.

Maybe this is something Bush will do that I have to give the guy credit
for.

-Mike

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Ed wrote:

> "Tess Millay" <> wrote
>
>
>>Barring the announcement of more damning things than (1) his
>>1985 memo yada to dismantle Roe v. Wade step by step
>
>
>>I mean, are you being funny, or is there some truth to this
>>allegation of Alito commmitting kittencide?
>
>
>
> Hmmm, it's ok to kill babies but it's not ok to kill kittens.
> Very interesting.
>
> I hate cats. I love kids.

Me too.

I think cats are pests. In suburban and rural parts of New England,
feral cats make nights hideous with their meowing and howling. They
kill birds too. And they scare me. Some of the feral tom-cats in New
England look like small panthers when they're skulking in the dark. I
wouldn't want to go near them.


--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:

Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

He will be confirmed by a bigger margin than you project, and I'm a moderate
Republican. Does "chasing minorities out" mean he doesn't support
affirmative action, a.k.a. quotas and/or special admission criteria?
I only thought the stanch left support affirmative action.


"Tess Millay" <> wrote in message
news:RhVsf.10835$
> "Mike Stone" <> wrote
> Flash
>> > girls should be forced to take off their clothes at the
> whim of the
>> > government.
>> > -Alito is in favor of police states that shoot suspects
> attempting to
>> > -Alito is not, nor has he solicited favor among women's
> civil rights
>> > abortionist groups.
>>
>> He also once filled a burlap bag with little kittens and
> smashed them
>> with a baseball bat.
>>
>> I bet he's filibustered.
>>
>> My prediction for 06.
>
> Barring the announcement of more damning things than (1) his
> 1985 memo yada to dismantle Roe v. Wade step by step; (2)
> the failure to recuse on the Vanguard cases; (3) his happy
> affiliation with AFAIC a Princeton alumni group trying to
> chase minorities out; and assuming he doesn't make a gaffe
> or show arrogance in explaining these; my prediction is
> he'll be confirmed by one of the slimmer votes in history.
> Unfortunately. He was looking pretty good (to me, a Moderate
> Democrat) until all this came out a month or so ago.
>
>

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Then the bets are placed.

Harriett Miers was nominated on Oct. 3rd. On October 8th,
following Senator Specter's effectively calling Harriett
Miers not bright, on Usenet I predicted she would not make
it to a full Senate vote. On October 27th, she submitted her
withdrawal letter to Pres. Bush.

I figured Roberts would be easily confirmed as well. I would
have voted for him (not with great enthusiasm but not
exactly with hesitation, either).

"NoEd" <> wrote
> He will be confirmed by a bigger margin than you project,

Your prediction is a bit vague, but it's based somewhat on
my own vagueness. So I'll put more teeth into my wager:
Alito will win confirmation with at least 54 but not more
than 69 votes. 'Cause he's smart enough not to Bork this.

Again, this assumes no more startling revelations come out.
If further startling revelations come out, or he isn't
bloody charming and humble about his career's earlier
gaffes, then he's looking at the nuclear option (filibuster
etc.) And Bush's ratings are likely to plummet. Again. For
now, filibuster will continue to get chatter but won't
happen.

Roberts won confirmation, 78-22. He won all 55 Republican
senators' votes, 22 Democrats' votes, and the one
Independent's vote. Twenty-two other Democrats voted against
him.

> and I'm a moderate
> Republican. Does "chasing minorities out" mean he doesn't
support
> affirmative action, a.k.a. quotas and/or special admission
criteria?

Google on Alito and his alumni group, and you'll see the
whole story.

It goes further than what you say.

> I only thought the stanch left support affirmative action.

George Bush the elder and younger, Gerald Ford, of course
many GOPers in the current Congress, among others, continue
to support federal affirmative action programs. Else the
federal laws (not Executive Orders) would be tossed out.

Federal affirmative action programs (and I do mean bona fide
preferences based on race, gender, and Vietnam veteran
status) as we know them today were given serious teeth by
none other than Republican Richard Nixon.

> "Tess Millay" <> wrote in
message
>
news:RhVsf.10835$
> > "Mike Stone" <> wrote
> > Flash
> >> > girls should be forced to take off their clothes at
the
> > whim of the
> >> > government.
> >> > -Alito is in favor of police states that shoot
suspects
> > attempting to
> >> > -Alito is not, nor has he solicited favor among
women's
> > civil rights
> >> > abortionist groups.
> >>
> >> He also once filled a burlap bag with little kittens
and
> > smashed them
> >> with a baseball bat.
> >>
> >> I bet he's filibustered.
> >>
> >> My prediction for 06.
> >
> > Barring the announcement of more damning things than (1)
his
> > 1985 memo yada to dismantle Roe v. Wade step by step;
(2)
> > the failure to recuse on the Vanguard cases; (3) his
happy
> > affiliation with AFAIC a Princeton alumni group trying
to
> > chase minorities out; and assuming he doesn't make a
gaffe
> > or show arrogance in explaining these; my prediction is
> > he'll be confirmed by one of the slimmer votes in
history.
> > Unfortunately. He was looking pretty good (to me, a
Moderate
> > Democrat) until all this came out a month or so ago.
> >
> >
>
>
>

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Are you betting on tradesports? I'm sure they have a way to bet
on his nomination there.

Tess Millay <> wrote:
> Then the bets are placed.
>
> Harriett Miers was nominated on Oct. 3rd. On October 8th,
> following Senator Specter's effectively calling Harriett
> Miers not bright, on Usenet I predicted she would not make
> it to a full Senate vote. On October 27th, she submitted her
> withdrawal letter to Pres. Bush.
>
> I figured Roberts would be easily confirmed as well. I would
> have voted for him (not with great enthusiasm but not
> exactly with hesitation, either).
>
> "NoEd" <> wrote
>> He will be confirmed by a bigger margin than you project,
>
> Your prediction is a bit vague, but it's based somewhat on
> my own vagueness. So I'll put more teeth into my wager:
> Alito will win confirmation with at least 54 but not more
> than 69 votes. 'Cause he's smart enough not to Bork this.
>
> Again, this assumes no more startling revelations come out.
> If further startling revelations come out, or he isn't
> bloody charming and humble about his career's earlier
> gaffes, then he's looking at the nuclear option (filibuster
> etc.) And Bush's ratings are likely to plummet. Again. For
> now, filibuster will continue to get chatter but won't
> happen.
>
> Roberts won confirmation, 78-22. He won all 55 Republican
> senators' votes, 22 Democrats' votes, and the one
> Independent's vote. Twenty-two other Democrats voted against
> him.
>
>> and I'm a moderate
>> Republican. Does "chasing minorities out" mean he doesn't
> support
>> affirmative action, a.k.a. quotas and/or special admission
> criteria?
>
> Google on Alito and his alumni group, and you'll see the
> whole story.
>
> It goes further than what you say.
>
>> I only thought the stanch left support affirmative action.
>
> George Bush the elder and younger, Gerald Ford, of course
> many GOPers in the current Congress, among others, continue
> to support federal affirmative action programs. Else the
> federal laws (not Executive Orders) would be tossed out.
>
> Federal affirmative action programs (and I do mean bona fide
> preferences based on race, gender, and Vietnam veteran
> status) as we know them today were given serious teeth by
> none other than Republican Richard Nixon.
>
>> "Tess Millay" <> wrote in
> message
>>
> news:RhVsf.10835$
>> > "Mike Stone" <> wrote
>> > Flash
>> >> > girls should be forced to take off their clothes at
> the
>> > whim of the
>> >> > government.
>> >> > -Alito is in favor of police states that shoot
> suspects
>> > attempting to
>> >> > -Alito is not, nor has he solicited favor among
> women's
>> > civil rights
>> >> > abortionist groups.
>> >>
>> >> He also once filled a burlap bag with little kittens
> and
>> > smashed them
>> >> with a baseball bat.
>> >>
>> >> I bet he's filibustered.
>> >>
>> >> My prediction for 06.
>> >
>> > Barring the announcement of more damning things than (1)
> his
>> > 1985 memo yada to dismantle Roe v. Wade step by step;
> (2)
>> > the failure to recuse on the Vanguard cases; (3) his
> happy
>> > affiliation with AFAIC a Princeton alumni group trying
> to
>> > chase minorities out; and assuming he doesn't make a
> gaffe
>> > or show arrogance in explaining these; my prediction is
>> > he'll be confirmed by one of the slimmer votes in
> history.
>> > Unfortunately. He was looking pretty good (to me, a
> Moderate
>> > Democrat) until all this came out a month or so ago.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Ha.

I don't put money on wagers such as this. It's more of a "if
forced to bet, this is how I would." Or to show off my
astuteness when it comes to the Court, including its major
decisions. Or for fun, since no one really cares about
mutual funds anymore, preferring the group be anchored by an
annual stock contest.

Not surprised you are anti-choice.

"Mike Stone" <> wrote
> Are you betting on tradesports? I'm sure they have a way
to bet
> on his nomination there.
>
> Tess Millay <> wrote:
> > Then the bets are placed.

yada yada Alito to be confirmed by a vote between 54 and 69,
barring yada... says Tess Millay.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Mike Stone" <> wrote in message
news:I9Wsf.249145$

> I have to agree with this. As much as I don't like Alito our abortion
> laws are to the left of France.
>
> Maybe this is something Bush will do that I have to give the guy credit
> for.

The USA cannot afford to outlaw abortion once again. Religion aside, it
simply is not an affordable option. Legal abortion has been a major factor
in crime reduction in the USA during the decades since Roe-Wade. If the
congress were foolish enough to reverse this trend because of pressure from
the religious right, I suspect the crime statistics would go back up again,
especially in light of the continuing unavailability of medical insurance
and needed care for a substantial proportion of the population. Thankfully,
no matter what the US does, abortion will remain legal in many more
enlightened nations. If religion wins in the US, the bus loads of people
coming up here to Canada to buy drugs at less cost will probably be joined
by more busloads of unfortunate women seeking abortions, and that would be a
shame.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Not surpised?? What does that mean?

I think you need to have some restriction on it.

Why are you always fighting with people?

Be happy!

-Mike

ps, is tess a troll? just some dude with too much time on his hands?

Tess Millay <> wrote:
> Ha.
>
> I don't put money on wagers such as this. It's more of a "if
> forced to bet, this is how I would." Or to show off my
> astuteness when it comes to the Court, including its major
> decisions. Or for fun, since no one really cares about
> mutual funds anymore, preferring the group be anchored by an
> annual stock contest.
>
> Not surprised you are anti-choice.
>
> "Mike Stone" <> wrote
>> Are you betting on tradesports? I'm sure they have a way
> to bet
>> on his nomination there.
>>
>> Tess Millay <> wrote:
>> > Then the bets are placed.
>
> yada yada Alito to be confirmed by a vote between 54 and 69,
> barring yada... says Tess Millay.
>
>

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Mike Stone" <> wrote
> Not surpised?? What does that mean?

Means I think I have your intelligence level pegged.

> I think you need to have some restriction on it.

You're back pedalling. Again. This ain't no popularity
contest, Mike. No big deal if you agree with Ed that
abortion kills babies. It is a big deal if you say one thing
then contradict it an hour later. (To make friends? I don't
want friends who bend with the wind.)

Every pro-choicer I know wants some restriction on it.

> Why are you always fighting with people?

I reject the premise of your ridiculous question.

What is happening is that you post such questionable
assertions that they invite challenge. Usenet is the
ultimate marketplace of ideas. Conversation is supposed to
get at truths, not flatter some old guy who's done a little
reading offline but is unaware that he's behind if he
doesn't ratchet it up with online study.

If you don't like this, killfile is an option.
> Be happy!

Again with the foolish assumptions.

> -Mike
>
> ps, is tess a troll? just some dude with too much time on
his hands?

Well, I don't rip off my employer and post from JP Morgan
etc., if that's what you mean.

I invite your killfiling me. Make yourself happy! :-)

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Let's see.
You don't make real bets.
You don't participate in the investing contests.
You sure do have plenty to say though.
I doubt you have a partner in life but if you do, I pity that person.





"Tess Millay" <> wrote in message
news:IsXsf.1852$M%
> Ha.
>
> I don't put money on wagers such as this. It's more of a "if
> forced to bet, this is how I would." Or to show off my
> astuteness when it comes to the Court, including its major
> decisions. Or for fun, since no one really cares about
> mutual funds anymore, preferring the group be anchored by an
> annual stock contest.
>
> Not surprised you are anti-choice.
>
> "Mike Stone" <> wrote
>> Are you betting on tradesports? I'm sure they have a way
> to bet
>> on his nomination there.
>>
>> Tess Millay <> wrote:
>> > Then the bets are placed.
>
> yada yada Alito to be confirmed by a vote between 54 and 69,
> barring yada... says Tess Millay.
>
>

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Tess Millay" <> wrote

>> Why are you always fighting with people?
>
> I reject the premise of your ridiculous question.

It's true. Face it, you are a blue ribbon bitch.
You especially dislike the male race and hold a special hatred for
engineers.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Tess Millay wrote:
> It would be a crime not to investigate why he didn't recuse
> himself with the Vanguard cases.

I didn't say it wasn't under investigation - only the course of the
outcome appears likely to be overlooked as commonplace and lacking
coherent substance. While it may be negligent to overlook any factor
that negatively effects social well-being, criminal culpability is not
based upon assumption; before you best reconsider what apparent
circumstances have to bear to warrant discovery disclosed.

> > the $100K issue wouldn't seem to have the same prominence.

> > Looks to me like he's in a wheel of continued churning,
>
> Come on. His portfolio lacks any meaningful international
> exposure, but otherwise he's got a reasonably diverse
> portfolio. How can you call that churning?
>
> bad writing deleted

Right. It's pretty much allegorical to me - something along the line of
a 'churning -polical- wheel of the reviewed, and anticipation for the
relentless in-you-face, no-holds-barred scruitiny of worthiness exacted
upon aspirers to the hallowed halls of judiciary acumen,' on newspeak
tonight, Kennedy in part is hosting. I don't closely follow the
protocols.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Flasherly" <> wrote
> Tess Millay wrote:
> > It would be a crime not to investigate why he didn't
recuse
> > himself with the Vanguard cases.
>
> I didn't say it wasn't under investigation -

Yes, I know. I was just saying.

> only the course of the
> outcome appears likely to be overlooked as commonplace and
lacking
> coherent substance.

Not as long as Elliot Spitzer lives.

> While it may be negligent to overlook any factor
> that negatively effects social well-being, criminal
culpability is not
> based upon assumption; before you best reconsider what
apparent
> circumstances have to bear to warrant discovery disclosed.

I can't translate this in less than two minutes.

> > > the $100K issue wouldn't seem to have the same
prominence.
>
> > > Looks to me like he's in a wheel of continued
churning,
> >
> > Come on. His portfolio lacks any meaningful
international
> > exposure, but otherwise he's got a reasonably diverse
> > portfolio. How can you call that churning?
> >
> > bad writing deleted
>
> Right. It's pretty much allegorical to me

Oh. Right. I should have known. :-)

- something along the line of
> a 'churning -polical- wheel of the reviewed, and
anticipation for the
> relentless in-you-face, no-holds-barred scruitiny of
worthiness exacted
> upon aspirers to the hallowed halls of judiciary acumen,'
on newspeak
> tonight, Kennedy in part is hosting. I don't closely
follow the
> protocols.

Kennedy isn't a poser. (poseur?)

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Mike Stone" <> wrote in message
news:1dYsf.91799$

>
> ps, is tess a troll? just some dude with too much time on his hands?
>

Cunt, not dude ....

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Tess Millay wrote:
> > only the course of the
> > outcome appears likely to be overlooked as commonplace and
> lacking
> > coherent substance.
>
> Not as long as Elliot Spitzer lives.

Alito may have issues ready at hand, such business as Spitzer's
subpoenas to marble-alter dispensations at federally funded ACCs
(Abortion Crisis Centers). May as well make some use out of him - he's
not what I'd call a pretty media picture.

> I can't translate this in less than two minutes.

If you don't like the frontman's tune, mama, don't throw your beer in
the guitarist's face; he may be playing all the right notes.


> Kennedy isn't a poser. (poseur?)

Au contraire, Kennedy is after the Concerned Alumni of Princeton for
complicity links dated 30 years ago. I wonder if Kenney still enjoys
writing sleuths these days.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Flasherly" <> wrote in message
news:
>
> Tess Millay wrote:
> > > only the course of the
> > > outcome appears likely to be overlooked as commonplace
and
> > lacking
> > > coherent substance.
> >
> > Not as long as Elliot Spitzer lives.
>
> Alito may have issues ready at hand, such business as
Spitzer's
> subpoenas to marble-alter dispensations at federally
funded ACCs
> (Abortion Crisis Centers). May as well make some use out
of him - he's
> not what I'd call a pretty media picture.

I don't think we're talking about the same Spitzer.

> > I can't translate this in less than two minutes.
>
> If you don't like the frontman's tune, mama, don't throw
your beer in
> the guitarist's face; he may be playing all the right
notes.

A lady doesn't throw her glass of wine or anything but just
turns her back and walks out.

> > Kennedy isn't a poser. (poseur?)
>
> Au contraire, Kennedy is after the Concerned Alumni of
Princeton for
> complicity links dated 30 years ago.

Twenty years ago, and which they don't repudiate. And it
does say something about a man's character that, in the
mid-1980s(!), he would still favor association with
"restricted" (white, male, Gentile only yada) clubs, yada.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Tess Millay" <> wrote
> A lady doesn't throw her glass of wine or anything but just
> turns her back and walks out.

So, one of your habits is throwing beer/wine at people.
Got Bud?

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

While I'm not a supporter of Budweiser or Coors, I think that any
throwing of beer is at least a misdemeanor. If it is Guinness, Stella
Artois or Belhaven, you got yourself a felony fella. We don't cott'in
to beer throwing. And this behaviour only leads to small people
tossing. While not a crime it should be.

Some folks at Fidelity were tossing small people at a party and
Fidelity correctly dismissed them. Though that could have occurred
because the party was paid for by the company offering "research" in
exchange for higher cost trading fees. Listen what is better research
than which chick is better at lap dancing.

Hey don't accuse me of not sticking to the subject at hand. In fact
you guys are off topic. We were discussing what mutual funds the Judge
is holding. Personally I'd recommend that he invest in the neutronic
small world fund.

Mo

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

I think neutron is on to something.
It's ok to be off topic here. Just look around.

We have Herb and Sammy the Nose. Two guys that rarely even mention investing
let alone mutual funds.
I love Sammy, he's a pervert. He used some foul language once and I asked
him if he learned that at home.
His response:
". . . because, of course, whenever someone mentions sex to Ed,
the first thing he thinks of is motherhood. *His* mother, to be
specific, for whom he harbors fond memory. Fond memory for the
times she danced in front of little Ed, butt-naked except for the
fishnet stockings and leather lederhosen she wore, as she dusted
and fussed over her precious Hummel figurines. Pranced about the
house she did, dusting and fussing, when he was naught but a
snot-spewing feces-spurting child; and thus she injected into his
impressionable but troubled mind the prototypical schemata for
all subsequent female relations he would experience during his
long but dreary life. Oh, how she pranced, she pranced, in her
size XXXL leather lederhosen! Which, incidentally, had to be
special-ordered from Bavaria. How her bosoms shook, jiggled, and
bounced! "

I think this guy is right up there with Nancy Luft. He deserves the "Full
Canvas Jacket" award.


Sam tried to set me up in an ambush, but his buddies at alt.tasteless told
him to grow up.


He hasn't. Sam is an asshole. I call him Sammy the asshole because whenever
Herb shows up to document his stupidity, Sammy is right behind. His nose
seems to be stuck in Herbie's ass.







"Maurice" <> wrote in message
news:
> While I'm not a supporter of Budweiser or Coors, I think that any
> throwing of beer is at least a misdemeanor. If it is Guinness, Stella
> Artois or Belhaven, you got yourself a felony fella. We don't cott'in
> to beer throwing. And this behaviour only leads to small people
> tossing. While not a crime it should be.
>
> Some folks at Fidelity were tossing small people at a party and
> Fidelity correctly dismissed them. Though that could have occurred
> because the party was paid for by the company offering "research" in
> exchange for higher cost trading fees. Listen what is better research
> than which chick is better at lap dancing.
>
> Hey don't accuse me of not sticking to the subject at hand. In fact
> you guys are off topic. We were discussing what mutual funds the Judge
> is holding. Personally I'd recommend that he invest in the neutronic
> small world fund.
>
> Mo
>

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Tess Millay wrote:
> I don't think we're talking about the same Spitzer.

Ol' Strongarm Spitzer of WSJ renown - who's repudiated to have issued
threats when he didn't like certain sources the WSJ article cited.

> A lady doesn't throw her glass of wine or anything but just
> turns her back and walks out.

Invariably so in Harlequins. Although, there's something to be said for
a perfectly formed set purity to a backside sashaying remarkably out
the door, depending on the lady, I suppose, and as otherwise dreadful
sights to behold go. Ladies, whether or not in-the-rough, do what and
when they want, way I see. By a matter of degree. Last one emminently
qualified to throw her glass of beer in my face had danced on American
Bandstand. Lots of rhythm qualifies a sense she had for a difference
when stroking different folks. I didn't melt, as an old adagio goes -
a little bitterhop tear ain't letting me down.

> Twenty years ago, and which they don't repudiate. And it
> does say something about a man's character that, in the
> mid-1980s(!), he would still favor association with
> "restricted" (white, male, Gentile only yada) clubs, yada.

I read it a 1970 association - which Alito disavows from belief or
memory. Won't be saying much of anything if Kennedy on no one steps up
to make the league stick.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

"Flasherly" <> wrote
> Tess Millay wrote:
> > I don't think we're talking about the same Spitzer.
>
> Ol' Strongarm Spitzer of WSJ renown - who's repudiated to
have issued
> threats when he didn't like certain sources the WSJ
article cited.

I think you're teasing.

w
a
l
k
e
d

o
u
t
> > Twenty years ago, and which they don't repudiate. And it
> > does say something about a man's character that, in the
> > mid-1980s(!), he would still favor association with
> > "restricted" (white, male, Gentile only yada) clubs,
yada.
>
> I read it a 1970 association - which Alito disavows from
belief or
> memory.

He graduated in the 1970s. He was bragging about his
membership in this organization in the 1980s.

> Won't be saying much of anything if Kennedy on no one
steps up
> to make the league stick.

Do you reside in the U.S.? Contemporary law isn't your
schtick, that's for sure.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Tess Millay wrote:

>He graduated in the 1970s. He was bragging about his
>membership in this organization in the 1980s.

> > Won't be saying much of anything if Kennedy on no one
> steps up
> > to make the league stick.
>
> Do you reside in the U.S.? Contemporary law isn't your
> schtick, that's for sure.

Tied to swaggering, boisterous admissions he boldly made to Edward
Meese, Reagan's pointman for secret arms sales, in a bid for promotion
in the administration. No doubt, as you say, he's not strayed far from
a credo the Concerned Alumni of Princeton practiced during its heyday.
I cannot help but note a certain farcicality in arguements undertaken
from unsound premises, and until someone from CAP's staff shows
consequent reason to implicate the man, I'd as soon leave it to
liberals in like-minded vindictiveness to pursue by whatever means
affairs of law, or not, consider relevant. In a nation that conceivably
touts more prisoners and lawyers per capita than any other, I should
think you may rest assured, that willful needs pressing issues portend
will be assessed to a citizenty in due sovereign measure;--For how else
judges endure a peoples rite in a manor of clamour squawking seagulls
abide, I'm sure, I should be amiss to say.

Re: Judge Alito's Investments

Ed wrote: I love Sammy, he's a pervert. ...she injected into his
impressionable but troubled mind the prototypical schemata for all
subsequent female relations he would experience during his long but
dreary life.

That's what Little Sammy is apt to run into when hanging in the likes
of Greenwich Village, where stranger dreams are staged.