mimf 2006 trades

buy
20 GOOG
100 AAPL
100 MDY

I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.

Sidd

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"SD" <> wrote in message
news:dqjlp4$dcg$
> buy
> 20 GOOG
> 100 AAPL
> 100 MDY
>
> I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>
> Sidd

It's interesting that you would choose todays close over tomorrows open.
GOOG closed at 467.11, after hours trading has it down to 454.11.
AAPL 84.71/83.50
MDY 139.72/138.93

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"Ed" <> wrote in message
news:
>
> "SD" <> wrote in message
> news:dqjlp4$dcg$
>> buy
>> 20 GOOG
>> 100 AAPL
>> 100 MDY
>>
>> I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>>
>> Sidd
>
> It's interesting that you would choose todays close over tomorrows open.
> GOOG closed at 467.11, after hours trading has it down to 454.11.
> AAPL 84.71/83.50
> MDY 139.72/138.93
>
It's amazing what hindsight could do for the investor. It could get worse
though. Note the wild tech stock selling in Japan where they had to close
the stock exchange early because it was overloading with sell orders after
some criminal investigation. Will tech stock jitters spread to the US
markets and affect Google and Apple? Should we sell Japan funds now or buy
more when they have gone down? If only we knew these things in advance!

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"David Wilkinson" <> wrote
> It's amazing what hindsight could do for the investor. It could get worse
> though. Note the wild tech stock selling in Japan where they had to close
> the stock exchange early because it was overloading with sell orders after
> some criminal investigation. Will tech stock jitters spread to the US
> markets and affect Google and Apple? Should we sell Japan funds now or buy
> more when they have gone down? If only we knew these things in advance!

The sellers aren't through in Japan. I think if you sold today and bought
back in after it settled down you could be in a better position.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"Ed" <> wrote in message
news:
>
> "David Wilkinson" <> wrote
>> It's amazing what hindsight could do for the investor. It could get worse
>> though. Note the wild tech stock selling in Japan where they had to close
>> the stock exchange early because it was overloading with sell orders
>> after some criminal investigation. Will tech stock jitters spread to the
>> US markets and affect Google and Apple? Should we sell Japan funds now or
>> buy more when they have gone down? If only we knew these things in
>> advance!
>
> The sellers aren't through in Japan. I think if you sold today and bought
> back in after it settled down you could be in a better position.
>
You could easily be right but my Japan fund fell yesterday and it will fall
again today. If I sell now it will crystallise a loss even though it might
prevent a bigger one. On the other hand the whole thing may blow over in a
day or two and the fund go back up and I would miss that. My inclination is
to avoid trying to chase the fluctuations and to stick with it for the long
term, pending a quarterly re-balance at the end of March. It's not as though
the whole Japanese economy is faltering, just one company, Japan's version
of Enron presumably.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

Ed wrote:
> "SD" <> wrote in message
> news:dqjlp4$dcg$
>
>>buy
>>20 GOOG
>>100 AAPL
>>100 MDY
>>
>>I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>>
>>Sidd
>
>
> It's interesting that you would choose todays close over tomorrows open.
> GOOG closed at 467.11, after hours trading has it down to 454.11.
> AAPL 84.71/83.50
> MDY 139.72/138.93
>
>
I wasn't expecting the severe decline! My expectations were for a mild rise.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

Buy

500 IFN
using ask price 41.14 from scottrade at 10:53

SD wrote:
> buy
> 20 GOOG
> 100 AAPL
> 100 MDY
>
> I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>
> Sidd

Re: mimf 2006 trades

David Wilkinson wrote:

> Will tech stock jitters spread to the US
> markets and affect Google and Apple?
>
Actually, it's more to do with Yahoo! missing the target. De Ja Vue of
last year when eBay missed earnings by a penny. It's brutal when these
high p/e tech stocks miss the target.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

I see you are still in cash, TK. Do you know something we don't or are you
going to venture into funds or stocks one day?

"TK Sung" <> wrote in message
news:
> David Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> Will tech stock jitters spread to the US
>> markets and affect Google and Apple?
>>
> Actually, it's more to do with Yahoo! missing the target. De Ja Vue of
> last year when eBay missed earnings by a penny. It's brutal when these
> high p/e tech stocks miss the target.
>

Re: mimf 2006 trades

I just hadn't recorded, that's all. It's in there now.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

Buy
200 PNRA @ 63.63
200 COST @ 50.55

SD wrote:
> buy
> 20 GOOG
> 100 AAPL
> 100 MDY
>
> I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>
> Sidd

Re: mimf 2006 trades

Sidd

These deals all look fine.

David

"SD" <> wrote in message
news:dqm79d$gjp$
> Buy
> 200 PNRA @ 63.63
> 200 COST @ 50.55
>
> SD wrote:
>> buy
>> 20 GOOG
>> 100 AAPL
>> 100 MDY
>>
>> I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>>
>> Sidd

Re: mimf 2006 trades

TK, how do I check that the price you used for OQDMAX of 57.00 is correct
for 4 Jan?

Also, you are supposed to put the deals in as transactions in Finance-Yahoo
and post them to mimf as you do them, not two weeks later. Otherwise you
could, conceivably, have waited until Jan 18 to see how good they were and
then put them in as from Jan 4. You know all this as last contest manager.
However, you also you put in a "mistaken" buy and sell of GOPMHX for Jan 4
and lost $1,268 in less than a day, showing the risks of put options!

I conclude from that and from checking nearly everything else, that all of
the deals ring true, but you are playing fast and loose with the rules.
Please record deals as you do them from now on or they won't be accepted!

David

"TK Sung" <> wrote in message
news:
>I just hadn't recorded, that's all. It's in there now.
>

Re: mimf 2006 trades

No more CSR for you??

David Wilkinson wrote:
> Sidd
>
> These deals all look fine.
>
> David
>
> "SD" <> wrote in message
> news:dqm79d$gjp$
>
>>Buy
>>200 PNRA @ 63.63
>>200 COST @ 50.55
>>
>>SD wrote:
>>
>>>buy
>>>20 GOOG
>>>100 AAPL
>>>100 MDY
>>>
>>>I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>>>
>>>Sidd
>
>
>

Re: mimf 2006 trades

Another opportunity missed! If I had known it would go up 10% in two weeks I
would have put it in one or both of my contest portfolios. Luckily I had
some CSR in my real portfolio, but a lot less than 100%.

"SD" <> wrote in message
news:dqmcf1$jk4$
> No more CSR for you??
>
> David Wilkinson wrote:
>> Sidd
>>
>> These deals all look fine.
>>
>> David
>>
>> "SD" <> wrote in message
>> news:dqm79d$gjp$
>>
>>>Buy
>>>200 PNRA @ 63.63
>>>200 COST @ 50.55
>>>
>>>SD wrote:
>>>
>>>>buy
>>>>20 GOOG
>>>>100 AAPL
>>>>100 MDY
>>>>
>>>>I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>>>>
>>>>Sidd
>>
>>

Re: mimf 2006 trades

David, the transaction was posted on 1/4. Sorry, can't help you with
historic OQDMA price. I guess you'll just have to trust me if you
didn't verify it on that day. :-) If you can get hold of intra-day
graph on 1/4, you might be able to verify. (That's what I used to do on
your transactions). Does anyone have an idea?

Options have rather large spread, so you're going to lose quite a bit
if you buy/sell immediately. That's why I usually use limit order for
options. Come to think of it, I way overcharged myself for commission.
$32 was for limit order on 20 contracts. Oh well.



> but you are playing fast and loose with the rules.
> Please record deals as you do them from now on or they won't be accepted!
>
Is this a new rule? Or are you making it up as you go? If it wasn't
stated, I'll be waiting for your apology!

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"TK Sung" <> wrote in message
news:
> David, the transaction was posted on 1/4. Sorry, can't help you with
> historic OQDMA price. I guess you'll just have to trust me if you
> didn't verify it on that day. :-) If you can get hold of intra-day
> graph on 1/4, you might be able to verify. (That's what I used to do on
> your transactions). Does anyone have an idea?
>
Er.. then why did I just ask if you were going to stay in cash forever and
you then said you had done the deals earlier but not put them in? I check
all the portfolios for new deals every day and there were none on yours from
1/4 until the last day or so. I am happy all your deals were genuine but
just reminding you to put them in. I thought your commissions were high as
others are quoting $7. If they were wrong then you should edit them to the
correct numbers.

> Options have rather large spread, so you're going to lose quite a bit
> if you buy/sell immediately. That's why I usually use limit order for
> options. Come to think of it, I way overcharged myself for commission.
> $32 was for limit order on 20 contracts. Oh well.
>
>
>
>> but you are playing fast and loose with the rules.
>> Please record deals as you do them from now on or they won't be accepted!
>>
> Is this a new rule? Or are you making it up as you go? If it wasn't
> stated, I'll be waiting for your apology!
>
No and no and no apology. See the set of rules I published in late December.
Rule 5 was:

5) Do deals as you would with your broker or fund company at current prices
and post them on the NG as soon as you have the numbers. Put them in as
transactions in Finance.Yahoo as soon as possible.

I know you saw these rules as you responded by sending me a copy of the set
of rules for the 2005 contest that you ran.

Are we operating in parallel universes, TK? :-)

David

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"David Wilkinson" <> wrote in message
news:dql8vf$3qt$
>
> "Ed" <> wrote in message
> news:
>>
>> "David Wilkinson" <> wrote
>>> It's amazing what hindsight could do for the investor. It could get
>>> worse though. Note the wild tech stock selling in Japan where they had
>>> to close the stock exchange early because it was overloading with sell
>>> orders after some criminal investigation. Will tech stock jitters spread
>>> to the US markets and affect Google and Apple? Should we sell Japan
>>> funds now or buy more when they have gone down? If only we knew these
>>> things in advance!
>>
>> The sellers aren't through in Japan. I think if you sold today and bought
>> back in after it settled down you could be in a better position.
>>
> You could easily be right but my Japan fund fell yesterday and it will
> fall again today. If I sell now it will crystallise a loss even though it
> might prevent a bigger one. On the other hand the whole thing may blow
> over in a day or two and the fund go back up and I would miss that. My
> inclination is to avoid trying to chase the fluctuations and to stick with
> it for the long term, pending a quarterly re-balance at the end of March.
> It's not as though the whole Japanese economy is faltering, just one
> company, Japan's version of Enron presumably.
>
For once I may have been right! The Nikkei apparently jumped 2.3% yesterday
as the Japanese stock market "bounced back", according to Finance.Yahoo.
After going down 6% in two days, yesterday's Japan fund valuations would
have been the minimum and they will presumably go up 2.3% today. B&H wins
this time.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"David Wilkinson" <> wrote

> For once I may have been right! The Nikkei apparently jumped 2.3%
> yesterday as the Japanese stock market "bounced back", according to
> Finance.Yahoo. After going down 6% in two days, yesterday's Japan fund
> valuations would have been the minimum and they will presumably go up 2.3%
> today. B&H wins this time.

That's good news, I own shares of EWJ, an ETF that tracks the MSCI Japan
Index. I'm still thinking about selling and taking profits though. An
analyst/fund manager with Julius Baer was saying that Japanese stocks,
particularly the large caps, were selling at a premium of 100% or more to
European stocks. He thought they were, at minimum, fully valued or worst.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"Ed" <> wrote in message
news:
>
> "David Wilkinson" <> wrote
>
>> For once I may have been right! The Nikkei apparently jumped 2.3%
>> yesterday as the Japanese stock market "bounced back", according to
>> Finance.Yahoo. After going down 6% in two days, yesterday's Japan fund
>> valuations would have been the minimum and they will presumably go up
>> 2.3% today. B&H wins this time.
>
> That's good news, I own shares of EWJ, an ETF that tracks the MSCI Japan
> Index. I'm still thinking about selling and taking profits though. An
> analyst/fund manager with Julius Baer was saying that Japanese stocks,
> particularly the large caps, were selling at a premium of 100% or more to
> European stocks. He thought they were, at minimum, fully valued or worst.
>
A general Nikkei/Japan URL is but I can't seem
to find the p/e for the Nikkei index to check for over-valuation. Japanese
stocks always used to have extremely high p/es when the Nikkei was at 40,000
in 1989 (and the Imperial Palace was worth more than California!) but I
don't know what they are now or even whether their accounting methods are
comparable to US and European ones. I tend to subconsciously feel that the
Nikkei must get back to 40,000 one day and as it is only about 15,000 and
rising, there is plenty of upside left. Probably an over-simplification!
However, all the things I read indicate the Japanese economy is on an
uptrend after a decade or so of stagnation, that the banks may even raise
the interest rate above 0% so the Yen will rise and, not least, that Toyota
is about to take over from GM as the world's biggest car maker. My Japan
fund is certainly doing a lot better than my US funds.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"David Wilkinson" <> wrote

> A general Nikkei/Japan URL is but I can't
> seem to find the p/e for the Nikkei index to check for over-valuation.
> Japanese stocks always used to have extremely high p/es when the Nikkei
> was at 40,000 in 1989 (and the Imperial Palace was worth more than
> California!) but I don't know what they are now or even whether their
> accounting methods are comparable to US and European ones.


See page 22.
It's for 2004 but te 2005 book should be coming out soon.

P/E, found it.

Monthly through the end of 2005

Re: P/E, found it.

Difficult to read, even with a magnifying glass, but I think the PER is 33.9
for the composite Nikkei. This is not ridiculously high. What is the PER for
the S&P500?. The FTSE100 is at about 14.

"Ed" <> wrote in message
news:
> Monthly through the end of 2005
>
>

Re: P/E, found it.

"David Wilkinson" <> wrote in message
news:dqns97$veq$
> Difficult to read, even with a magnifying glass, but I think the PER is
> 33.9 for the composite Nikkei. This is not ridiculously high. What is the
> PER for the S&P500?. The FTSE100 is at about 14.

At the top of the document you'll see a tool bar with a "+". Click on the
plus to make the document 125% of original size. If you don't have ths
feature it's time to update your Adobe reader.

P/E from S&P (17.9):


For the end of November the values can be found here:

Re: mimf 2006 trades

In article <dqnn9e$3eo$>,
"David Wilkinson" <> wrote:

> >
> A general Nikkei/Japan URL is but I can't seem
> to find the p/e for the Nikkei index to check for over-valuation. Japanese
> stocks always used to have extremely high p/es when the Nikkei was at 40,000
> in 1989 (and the Imperial Palace was worth more than California!) but I
> don't know what they are now or even whether their accounting methods are
> comparable to US and European ones. I tend to subconsciously feel that the
> Nikkei must get back to 40,000 one day and as it is only about 15,000 and
> rising, there is plenty of upside left. Probably an over-simplification!
> However, all the things I read indicate the Japanese economy is on an
> uptrend after a decade or so of stagnation, that the banks may even raise
> the interest rate above 0% so the Yen will rise and, not least, that Toyota
> is about to take over from GM as the world's biggest car maker. My Japan
> fund is certainly doing a lot better than my US funds.

By golly, but you traders/timers/momentum players sure do worry a
lot on the downside. All fussin' and frettin' and trying to peer
into the future.

Tolstoy once said, "Man proposes, God disposes."

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"sam grey" <> wrote in message
news:
> In article <dqnn9e$3eo$>,
> "David Wilkinson" <> wrote:
>
>> >
>> A general Nikkei/Japan URL is but I can't
>> seem
>> to find the p/e for the Nikkei index to check for over-valuation.
>> Japanese
>> stocks always used to have extremely high p/es when the Nikkei was at
>> 40,000
>> in 1989 (and the Imperial Palace was worth more than California!) but I
>> don't know what they are now or even whether their accounting methods are
>> comparable to US and European ones. I tend to subconsciously feel that
>> the
>> Nikkei must get back to 40,000 one day and as it is only about 15,000 and
>> rising, there is plenty of upside left. Probably an over-simplification!
>> However, all the things I read indicate the Japanese economy is on an
>> uptrend after a decade or so of stagnation, that the banks may even raise
>> the interest rate above 0% so the Yen will rise and, not least, that
>> Toyota
>> is about to take over from GM as the world's biggest car maker. My Japan
>> fund is certainly doing a lot better than my US funds.
>
> By golly, but you traders/timers/momentum players sure do worry a
> lot on the downside. All fussin' and frettin' and trying to peer
> into the future.
>
> Tolstoy once said, "Man proposes, God disposes."

Did Tolstoy invest on the Russian stock exchange of his day? Would he have
known the difference between FA, TA, MPT and CAPM? I thought not. I don't
think I can attach too much importance to investment strategies from dead
foreigners with no experience of the market! When I need my biography
written then I might get out the old Ouija board and try to contact him, but
otherwise no.

What you may not know is that the UK market fell by 75% in 1974 and this
could possibly happen again. Holding and doing nothing while this happened
and then waiting until 1979 for the market to recover is no part of my
system. Any sign of the market falling therefore produces a certain
restlessness.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

buy
250 AMD Limit Order @ 36.00
I will reply to this message if order executes.

SD wrote:
> buy
> 20 GOOG
> 100 AAPL
> 100 MDY
>
> I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>
> Sidd

Re: mimf 2006 trades

David Wilkinson wrote:
>
> Er.. then why did I just ask if you were going to stay in cash forever and
> you then said you had done the deals earlier but not put them in?
>
Er.. you probably asked because you missed my order on 1/4, and I then
said I had done the deal because that is what I had done?

> I check
> all the portfolios for new deals every day and there were none on yours from
> 1/4 until the last day or so.
>
It's better for you to monitor the orders rather than the portfolio.
Since one is required to record them "as soon as possible", it may be
too late for you to verify if you rely on the portolio entry. The
orders, on the other hand, must be submitted before the execution, so
they'll be always on time.

> Put them in as
> transactions in Finance.Yahoo as soon as possible.
>
Uh, ok, I didn't know you snuck in this sentence. But you still owe me
an apology dude. I wasn't fast and loose. I was tighter than your
upper lip! :)

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"TK Sung" <> wrote in message
news:
> David Wilkinson wrote:
>>
>> Er.. then why did I just ask if you were going to stay in cash forever
>> and
>> you then said you had done the deals earlier but not put them in?
>>
> Er.. you probably asked because you missed my order on 1/4, and I then
> said I had done the deal because that is what I had done?
>
>> I check
>> all the portfolios for new deals every day and there were none on yours
>> from
>> 1/4 until the last day or so.
>>
> It's better for you to monitor the orders rather than the portfolio.
> Since one is required to record them "as soon as possible", it may be
> too late for you to verify if you rely on the portolio entry. The
> orders, on the other hand, must be submitted before the execution, so
> they'll be always on time.
>
>> Put them in as
>> transactions in Finance.Yahoo as soon as possible.
>>
> Uh, ok, I didn't know you snuck in this sentence. But you still owe me
> an apology dude. I wasn't fast and loose. I was tighter than your
> upper lip! :)
>
OK, apology accepted, but remember I am British, from the nation of stiff
upper lips rather than tight ones, and I don't mean Botox. :-)

Re: mimf 2006 trades

David Wilkinson wrote:
> I am British, from the nation of stiff
> upper lips rather than tight ones, and I don't mean Botox. :-)
>
Eh, tomah-to, tomaytoe. Are brits too stiff-upper-lipped to apologize?

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"TK Sung" <> wrote in message
news:
> David Wilkinson wrote:
>> I am British, from the nation of stiff
>> upper lips rather than tight ones, and I don't mean Botox. :-)
>>
> Eh, tomah-to, tomaytoe. Are brits too stiff-upper-lipped to apologize?
>
I don't need to look back. I accept you posted the deals to mimf because you
say so, but you did not put them in the transactions. So, one win, one lose.
We call that a draw over here. Fast and loose was an exaggeration. Fast and
tight? Slow and loose? You were in there somewhere, but not slow and tight.

And yes, it is tomah-to, since you ask. We invented most of the English
words so we get to say how to pronounce them. :-)

Re: mimf 2006 trades

David Wilkinson wrote:
>
> I don't need to look back.
>
I knew it, Americans' inability to apologize is rooted in our British
origin!

> We call that a draw over here.
>
Well, alright... I won't sue you over it.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

In article <dqo3uc$6n9$>,
"David Wilkinson" <> wrote:

> Did Tolstoy invest on the Russian stock exchange of his day? Would he have
> known the difference between FA, TA, MPT and CAPM? I thought not. I don't
> think I can attach too much importance to investment strategies from dead
> foreigners with no experience of the market! When I need my biography
> written then I might get out the old Ouija board and try to contact him, but
> otherwise no.

I'm not sure Tolstoy had the stock market per se in mind when he
stated what he stated. I think he was thinking in more general
terms of principles that would cover a variety of different
situations, maybe including the market.

Well, since you bow to the idol of science and engineering,
perhaps we can instead look up what Newton and, uh, George
Westinghouse had to say about the market. And Tesla. Don't forget
Tesla, who believed that every time he had a nocturnal emission a
little bit of his spiritual essence was lost. Good physicist,
though.

David, there's a humanist hidden in you. Deep within, but I sense
it nonetheless. You know it and I know it. Don't fight it. Let it
rise to the surface. Put on your hippie sandals and get out your
banjo.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"sam grey" <> wrote
Re Brit David Wilkinson
> Well, since you bow to the idol of science and
engineering,

Intelligent Design is more scientific than David Wilkinson.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

The same could be said about most of us....

Speaking of intelligent design, who would ever locate a playground right
next to a sewage disposal site?

abc132

"." <> wrote in message
news:jiXzf.3320$
> "sam grey" <> wrote
> Re Brit David Wilkinson
>> Well, since you bow to the idol of science and
> engineering,
>
> Intelligent Design is more scientific than David Wilkinson.
>
>

Re: mimf 2006 trades

Most people don't claim to be a scientist or engineer. He
does.

"abc132" <> wrote
> The same could be said about most of us....
>
> Speaking of intelligent design, who would ever locate a
playground right
> next to a sewage disposal site?

The same people who are rebuilding New Orleans in the same
location, with no added protection.


> "." <> wrote
> > "sam grey" <> wrote
> > Re Brit David Wilkinson
> >> Well, since you bow to the idol of science and
> > engineering,
> >
> > Intelligent Design is more scientific than David
Wilkinson.
> >
> >
>
>
>

Re: mimf 2006 trades

Oh, guess I have some catching up to do. Could be an engineer, sounds kind
of narrow-minded. You know, the hard-assed type. I think a scientist would
not be so vocal, but more empirical.

abc132

"." <> wrote in message
news:gKYzf.10320$
> Most people don't claim to be a scientist or engineer. He
> does.
>
> "abc132" <> wrote
>> The same could be said about most of us....
>>
>> Speaking of intelligent design, who would ever locate a
> playground right
>> next to a sewage disposal site?
>
> The same people who are rebuilding New Orleans in the same
> location, with no added protection.
>
>
>> "." <> wrote
>> > "sam grey" <> wrote
>> > Re Brit David Wilkinson
>> >> Well, since you bow to the idol of science and
>> > engineering,
>> >
>> > Intelligent Design is more scientific than David
> Wilkinson.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: mimf 2006 trades

Hack "engineers" and hack "scientists" alike "think" the way
he does.

Regardless, that is my opinion. You get to know him on your
own terms. I have no interest in unfairly turning people
against him.

"abc132" <> wrote
> Oh, guess I have some catching up to do. Could be an
engineer, sounds kind
> of narrow-minded. You know, the hard-assed type. I think a
scientist would
> not be so vocal, but more empirical.
>
> abc132
>
> "." <> wrote in message
>
news:gKYzf.10320$
..
> > Most people don't claim to be a scientist or engineer.
He
> > does.
> >
> > "abc132" <> wrote
> >> The same could be said about most of us....
> >>
> >> Speaking of intelligent design, who would ever locate a
> > playground right
> >> next to a sewage disposal site?
> >
> > The same people who are rebuilding New Orleans in the
same
> > location, with no added protection.
> >
> >
> >> "." <> wrote
> >> > "sam grey" <> wrote
> >> > Re Brit David Wilkinson
> >> >> Well, since you bow to the idol of science and
> >> > engineering,
> >> >
> >> > Intelligent Design is more scientific than David
> > Wilkinson.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"." <> wrote in message
news:jiXzf.3320$
> "sam grey" <> wrote
> Re Brit David Wilkinson
>> Well, since you bow to the idol of science and
> engineering,
>
> Intelligent Design is more scientific than David Wilkinson.
>
>
Back to gratuitous insults then! Are things a bit slack on the bond front so
you have nothing better to do? Or is it because I have disproved all your
claims by beating the market every one of the last three years and with
three different contest portfolios in 2005? One of my 2005 portfolios is up
50% now. As the poet said "Look on my works ye mighty and despair".

Why has Caliban/Caroline/Elle turned into just a "."? Are you imploding or
has that latest diet gone too far?

Re: mimf 2006 trades

"David Wilkinson" <> wrote

> Why has Caliban/Caroline/Elle turned into just a "."? Are you imploding or
> has that latest diet gone too far?

Implosion sounds right.

Re: mimf 2006 trades

What happened to this order, Sidd?

David

"SD" <> wrote in message
news:dqoa1r$fkq$
> buy
> 250 AMD Limit Order @ 36.00
> I will reply to this message if order executes.
>
> SD wrote:
>> buy
>> 20 GOOG
>> 100 AAPL
>> 100 MDY
>>
>> I will enter todays closing price as my purchase price.
>>
>> Sidd